Four-Wheel Steering Crawl Control for Low-Traction Recovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Four-wheel vehicles often become stuck in adverse ground conditions due to loss of traction, such as snow, sand, or mud, as existing technologies fail to effectively manage wheel movement and traction in such scenarios.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an electronic control unit (ECU) that activates steering actuators and drive motors to execute crawl operations, where front and rear wheels are turned in opposite directions and driven in counterforces to generate a net positive force, allowing the vehicle to move laterally or forwardly out of stuck conditions by improving traction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the vehicle uses conventional driving methods in adverse ground conditions, then the vehicle structure remains simple, but the vehicle loses traction and becomes stuck

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraction capabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic wheel control by independently adjusting the steering angle and rotation direction of each wheel based on real-time ground conditions. The ECU coordinates front and rear wheels to rotate in opposite directions, creating lateral movement capability that adapts to adverse conditions like snow, sand, and mud, thereby improving traction reliability without requiring complex mechanical modifications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters by controlling wheels to rotate in opposite directions and at different speeds. The ECU modulates the rotation direction, speed, and steering angle of individual wheels to generate net positive force in desired directions, enabling the vehicle to extricate itself from stuck conditions while maintaining manageable control system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the vehicle activates all four wheels for movement, then the vehicle gains better traction, but the control complexity increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovetractionVSAvoidsteering and drive control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines steering and drive functions into a unified control strategy. The ECU simultaneously manages steering actuators and drive motors for all four wheels, coordinating their operations to produce synergistic effects. By merging these functions, the system achieves enhanced traction while avoiding the complexity of separate independent control systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements multi-functionality by using the same ECU and control architecture to manage both steering and drive operations. The front and rear wheels serve multiple purposes: they can steer independently, drive in opposite directions, and work together to generate lateral or forward movement, reducing the need for specialized components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the vehicle wheels are turned in opposite directions, then the vehicle can move laterally out of stuck conditions, but the force management becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemaneuverabilityVSAvoidforce coordination
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the vehicle's force generation into independent front and rear wheel systems. Each axle can generate force independently in opposite directions, allowing the vehicle to move laterally, forward, or backward by coordinating these segmented force vectors. This segmentation enables versatile maneuverability while keeping individual control units manageable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables four-wheel vehicles to extricate themselves from adverse conditions by generating sufficient traction and movement, improving maneuverability and stability, especially in challenging terrains like snow, sand, or mud.

Implementation Method 1

improving traction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS11993262B2Crawl operations for four-wheel steering vehicles
Publication Date: 2024.05.28 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US11993262B2 patent drawing
  • US11993262B2 patent drawing
  • US11993262B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Crawl operations for four-wheel steering vehicles are described herein. An example vehicle described herein includes four wheels, a front steering actuator to turn the front wheels, a rear steering actuator to turn the rear wheels, a front drive motor to drive the front wheels, and a rear drive motor to drive the rear wheels. The vehicle also includes an electronic control unit (ECU) to activate the front steering actuator to turn the front wheels in a first direction, activate the rear steering actuator to turn the rear wheels in a second direction opposite the first direction such that the front wheels and the rear wheels are turned in opposite directions, activate the front drive motor to drive the front wheels in a reverse direction, and activate the rear drive motor to drive the rear wheels in a forward direction while the front wheels are driven in the reverse direction.