FPGA Partial Reconfiguration with Safe Signal Shutdown
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Developing a programmable logic device (PLD) capable of partial reconfiguration is a difficult and error-prone task due to the complexity of managing partial design changes while maintaining operational integrity.
Innovation Solution
A system-level design tool that allows users to define partial reconfigurable domains within PLDs, enabling selective configuration of personas with compatible interfaces, and includes a reconfig control block for safe shutdown and re-enablement of signals, facilitating efficient partial reconfiguration.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Loss of energy
If partial reconfiguration is implemented in PLD, then size, cost, and power consumption are reduced, but design complexity and error-proneness increase
Solution Approach 1:
The PLD is divided into multiple reconfigurable regions that can be independently configured and reconfigured. Each region can be managed separately with its own configuration memory and control logic, allowing partial reconfiguration without affecting other regions. This segmentation reduces overall power consumption by enabling selective reconfiguration of only the necessary regions while maintaining operational regions active.
Solution Approach 2:
The design tool automatically performs preliminary actions by generating the necessary control logic, configuration memory structures, and interface controllers before the actual partial reconfiguration process. This includes pre-defining reconfigurable regions, generating configuration data structures, and setting up the reconfiguration control state machine, thereby reducing manual design complexity and errors.
2Reliability
If partial reconfiguration is implemented in PLD, then fault tolerance and reliability are improved, but design difficulty and error-proneness increase
Solution Approach 1:
The PLD architecture is segmented into independent reconfigurable regions with separate configuration memories and control logic. This allows isolated reconfiguration of specific regions for fault testing and tolerance implementation without affecting other regions. Each region can be independently configured to test fault response, improving reliability while managing design complexity through modular segmentation.
Solution Approach 2:
The design tool acts as an intermediary that automatically generates the complex control logic, configuration management structures, and interface controllers needed for partial reconfiguration. This intermediary tool handles the difficult aspects of designing reconfiguration control, generating necessary hardware structures, and managing configuration data, thereby reducing manual design difficulty and error-proneness.
3Productivity
If system level design tool is used for partial reconfiguration, then design efficiency is improved, but tool complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The system level design tool provides universal functionality by integrating multiple capabilities into a single platform: it can define reconfigurable regions, generate control logic, create configuration memory structures, synthesize interface controllers, and manage configuration data all in one toolchain. This multi-functionality improves design efficiency by eliminating the need for multiple separate tools while managing tool complexity through integrated automation.
Solution Approach 2:
The design tool implements self-service by automatically generating the complex hardware structures and control logic required for partial reconfiguration based on user-defined parameters. It automatically creates reconfigurable region definitions, generates configuration memory structures, synthesizes interface controllers, and produces control state machines without requiring manual design of these complex elements, thereby improving design efficiency while managing complexity through automation.
Data Source
AI summary
Various embodiments of the present disclosure provide techniques for enabling a user to efficiently design a programmable logic device (PLD) capable of partial reconfiguration. In some implementations, a processor is configured to run a system level design tool and accepts, as inputs from a user, an identification of at least two personas to be used within a reconfigurable region of the PLD. The design tool defines one or more boundaries of a partial reconfig (PR) domain, the PR domain including a partitioned reconfigurable region of the PLD that is selectably configurable as any of the at least two personas. In some implementations, the PR domain includes at least one IP component configured to safely shut down at least one signal, the at least one signal originating from or directed toward an element of the PLD outside of the PR domain.


