FPGA Pin Assignment Optimization via Breakout Pattern Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing FPGA design tools fail to optimize pin assignments effectively, leading to sub-optimal designs due to neglect of breakout and fanout patterns, resulting in inefficient use of design resources and increased design iterations.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system for synthesizing device I/O associated with PCB designs, which generates programmable device models and determines pin assignments based on breakout patterns and fanout locations to minimize crossovers, considering electrical, logical, and physical constraints, and automatically assigns bundles to preferred PCB layers and determines breakout directions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If existing FPGA design tools are used for pin assignment optimization, then basic design rules are satisfied, but breakout and fanout patterns are neglected resulting in sub-optimal routing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepin assignment optimizationVSAvoidrouting quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of breakout and fanout patterns during the pin assignment phase, before actual routing is generated. By pre-identifying optimal breakout locations and fanout directions, the system establishes a foundation for high-quality routing that accounts for PCB layer constraints and signal integrity requirements from the outset.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The optimization extends from traditional 2D pin-to-pin routing considerations to incorporate the third dimension of PCB layer stacking. The system analyzes breakout patterns across multiple PCB layers and determines optimal fanout directions that utilize available layer space, transforming a planar routing problem into a three-dimensional routing strategy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If traditional pin assignment methods are used, then design convergence is achieved, but the number of design iterations increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign convergenceVSAvoiddesign iterations
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary optimization of pin assignments by analyzing breakout patterns and fanout directions before the main routing process. This pre-optimization reduces the number of iterative adjustments needed during subsequent design phases, as critical routing constraints are addressed upfront rather than discovered through repeated trial and error.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that evaluate routing quality based on breakout and fanout pattern analysis. By continuously assessing whether pin assignments align with optimal breakout locations and fanout directions, the system provides guidance for iterative improvements, reducing the total number of design cycles required to achieve convergence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If pin assignments are determined without considering breakout patterns, then assignment simplicity is maintained, but routability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepin assignment simplicityVSAvoidroutability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables the pin assignment process to self-optimize by automatically analyzing breakout patterns and fanout directions. Rather than requiring manual intervention to consider complex routing constraints, the algorithm independently evaluates multiple assignment options and selects configurations that naturally align with optimal breakout locations, maintaining simplicity while improving routability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The optimization approach changes the parameters considered during pin assignment from simple electrical connectivity to include spatial relationships with breakout locations and fanout directions. By incorporating these additional parameters into the assignment criteria, the system transforms pin selection from a purely electrical constraint problem to a combined electrical-geometric optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8667454B1System, method, and computer program product for optimizing pins
Publication Date: 2014.03.04 CADENCE DESIGN SYST INC
  • US8667454B1 patent drawing
  • US8667454B1 patent drawing
  • US8667454B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a computer-implemented method for synthesis of device I/O associated with a printed circuit board (PCB) design. The method may include generating a first programmable device model and a second device model. The method may further include determining one or more pin assignments associated with the first programmable device model and the second device model based upon, at least in part, one or more of a breakout pattern, a breakout location and a fanout location, the one or more pin assignments configured to minimize one or more crossovers.