FPGA Security Controller for Trusted Traffic Packet Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cybersecurity systems lack integrated security solutions for containerization and virtualization, leading to inefficiencies in securing traditional IT architectures and systems, particularly in compact platforms.

Innovation Solution

A hardware security controller (HSC) and software security controller (SSC) integrated into a field programmable gate array (FPGA) system, which manages traffic packets by inspecting and comparing application component features with stored inventories to perform operations such as routing, rerouting, and authorization, utilizing decision-making modules for trusted switching and encryption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If security functions are performed individually in traditional IT architectures, then each security component can be implemented with dedicated hardware, but the system becomes complex and difficult to integrate in compact platforms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity function reliabilityVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple individual security functions (intrusion detection, encryption, authentication, firewall) into a single integrated security controller device. This consolidation reduces system complexity in compact platforms while maintaining the reliability of each security function through dedicated hardware implementation within the unified device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The security controller is designed as a universal device that performs multiple security functions simultaneously - intrusion detection, encryption/decryption, authentication verification, and firewall operations. This multi-functional approach eliminates the need for separate dedicated hardware for each security function, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive security coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If multiple individual security solutions are deployed, then comprehensive security coverage is achieved, but the system size increases and becomes unsuitable for compact platforms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidsystem size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple security functions are merged into a single physical security controller device, achieving comprehensive security coverage without increasing system volume. The device integrates intrusion detection, encryption, authentication, and firewall capabilities in one compact unit suitable for modern platform constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The security controller employs a nested architecture where multiple security function modules are contained within a single controller device. Each security function (intrusion detection module, encryption module, authentication module) is nested within the unified controller structure, achieving comprehensive coverage in a compact form factor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Device complexity

If security functions are integrated into a single controller, then system complexity is reduced for compact platforms, but the controller must handle multiple security operations simultaneously increasing processing demands

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem integration complexityVSAvoidprocessing power requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The security controller is segmented into distinct functional modules - intrusion detection module, encryption module, authentication module, and firewall module. Each module handles specific security operations independently, reducing the processing burden on any single component while maintaining comprehensive security functionality within the unified controller.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The security controller acts as an intermediary device between the network interface and the system core, handling all security operations at a single point. This mediator approach consolidates processing demands in one location rather than distributing security checks throughout the system, reducing overall complexity while managing processing requirements centrally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12506709B2Method and system for managing traffic packets
Publication Date: 2025.12.23 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
  • US12506709B2 patent drawing
  • US12506709B2 patent drawing
  • US12506709B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments provide a system for managing traffic packets of application components. The system includes a security controller. The security controller may be coupled to a plurality of application components. The security controller includes one or more memories and a plurality of processors. The one or more memories are operable to store a set of application components features of each application component of the plurality of application components. The processors may be coupled with the memories and a processor may be configured to perform one or more steps. The processor receives traffic packets from a set of the plurality of application components coupled to the security controller. The processor receives traffic packets from a set of the plurality of application components coupled to the security controller.