Critical FPGA Sensor Identification for IHS Cooling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Information Handling Systems (IHS) face challenges in efficiently managing airflow cooling due to the high volume of temperature sensor data, leading to potential malfunctions and component failures when sensor data is unavailable, causing the cooling system to resort to less efficient open-loop cooling.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that identify critical temperature sensors within IHS, determine alert level thresholds, rank sensors based on these thresholds, and designate a subset for use by the airflow cooling system, allowing for closed-loop airflow cooling even when some sensors fail, thereby reducing unnecessary fan speed settings and maintaining efficient cooling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If all temperature sensors are used for closed-loop cooling control, then cooling precision is improved, but system complexity and data processing burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling control precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the temperature sensors into different priority groups (critical, important, optional) based on their location and importance to system cooling. This segmentation allows the system to selectively process data from only the most critical sensors, reducing data processing complexity while maintaining effective cooling control at key thermal zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and identifies a subset of critical temperature sensors from the complete sensor set based on predetermined criteria such as proximity to high-power components and thermal sensitivity. By taking out only the essential sensors for cooling control, the system achieves effective thermal management with reduced computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If sensor data from all temperature sensors is processed, then cooling effectiveness is improved, but data processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling effectivenessVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides temperature sensors into priority tiers, processing data from critical sensors first and using that information for immediate cooling decisions. This segmented processing approach ensures that the most time-sensitive thermal management actions are taken based on the most important temperature readings, reducing overall processing time while maintaining cooling effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by processing temperature data from only the critical subset of sensors required for effective cooling control, rather than processing data from all sensors. This partial processing approach provides sufficient information for timely cooling decisions without the computational overhead of analyzing every sensor reading.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of operation

If the cooling system uses open-loop control with preset fan speeds, then system simplicity is maintained, but cooling efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidcooling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a segmented control approach where critical temperature sensors trigger closed-loop control responses while less critical sensors maintain simpler monitoring. This segmentation allows the system to apply sophisticated closed-loop control only where necessary, preserving overall system simplicity while improving cooling efficiency at critical thermal zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Stability of the object's composition

If the cooling system reverts to open-loop control when sensor data is unavailable, then system stability is maintained, but cooling efficiency and reliability worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoidcooling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent prepares contingency plans in advance by identifying critical sensors and predetermined cooling responses before failures occur. When sensor failures happen, the system can immediately switch to appropriate fallback cooling strategies for the affected zones, maintaining system stability while minimizing the impact on overall cooling efficiency through pre-planned compensatory measures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentUS10853547B2System and method to identify critical FPGA card sensors
Publication Date: 2020.12.01 DELL PROD LP
  • US10853547B2 patent drawing
  • US10853547B2 patent drawing
  • US10853547B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments are described for identifying critical sensors of a device, such as a FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array) card, installed within an IHS (Information Handling System). A remote access controller identifies temperature sensors provided by the device and determine alert level thresholds for each of the sensors. The temperature sensors are ranked based on the respective ranges of the alert level thresholds. A first portion of the temperature sensors with the smallest ranges of alert level thresholds are assigned to a first ranked list. Readings from the temperature sensors are monitored and temperature sensors indicating temperature sensor readings rising faster than a first threshold are assigned to a second ranked list. A portion of the temperature sensors in the first ranked list and a portion of the temperature sensors in the second ranked list are designated for use by an airflow cooling system of the IHS.