Variability-Aware Statistical Timing Analysis for FPGA Path Delays

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current static timing analysis (STA) methods for programmable logic devices like FPGAs are impractical due to their reliance on abstracted timing models that fail to accurately account for variability in delay values, leading to overly optimistic or pessimistic results, which can result in timing constraint violations or suboptimal clock speeds.

Innovation Solution

The use of variability-aware statistical timing analysis models that incorporate mean delays, sigma factors, and delta factors for FPGA circuit elements, such as basic elements of logic and programmable interconnection points, to compute path delays more accurately, accounting for transistor-level random variations and systematic metal interconnect variations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If static timing analysis (STA) uses abstracted timing models for FPGA circuit elements, then the analysis can be performed efficiently, but the delay calculation accuracy deteriorates due to inability to account for variability in delay values

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetiming analysis efficiencyVSAvoiddelay calculation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameters used in timing models from single abstracted delay values to multiple statistical parameters (mean delay, sigma factor, delta factor) that capture variability. This allows the timing analysis to account for transistor-level random variations and systematic metal interconnect variations while maintaining computational efficiency through the use of pre-calculated statistical characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If STA produces optimistic delay estimates, then the analysis is faster and easier to work with, but timing constraint violations occur that were not predicted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetiming analysis simplicityVSAvoidtiming constraint satisfaction
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies beforehand cushioning by incorporating statistical variation factors (sigma and delta factors) into the timing analysis that account for worst-case scenarios. This cushions against optimistic estimates by pre-calculating the impact of variability and using it to adjust delay estimates, ensuring timing constraints are met even under adverse conditions without requiring overly pessimistic margins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Reliability

If STA produces pessimistic delay estimates, then timing constraints are reliably satisfied, but the circuit could potentially operate at faster clock speeds than predicted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetiming constraint satisfactionVSAvoidclock speed optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes from single-value delay parameters to statistical parameters that separate mean delay from variation (sigma and delta factors). This allows the timing analysis to distinguish between actual performance and variability, enabling more accurate determination of maximum clock speeds without violating timing constraints, thus avoiding unnecessary conservatism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If variability-aware statistical timing analysis models are used for FPGA circuit elements, then delay calculation accuracy is improved, but the complexity of the timing model increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelay calculation accuracyVSAvoidtiming model complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-calculating statistical characteristics (mean delay, sigma factor, delta factor) for FPGA circuit elements before timing analysis. This stores variability information in advance, allowing the timing analysis to use these pre-computed values without performing complex calculations during the actual timing verification, thus reducing computational complexity while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10162916B1Timing verification in a programmable circuit design using variation factors
Publication Date: 2018.12.25 XILINX INC
  • US10162916B1 patent drawing
  • US10162916B1 patent drawing
  • US10162916B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed approaches for processing a circuit design targeted to a programmable integrated circuit (IC) include inputting the circuit design to a programmed processor. Each path of the circuit design specifies a plurality of circuit elements of the programmable IC. For each circuit element specified in a path of the plurality of paths the processor looks up in a memory a mean delay associated with the circuit element, looks up a sigma factor associated with the circuit element, and looks up a delta factor associated with the circuit element. The processor determines a delay of the path as a function of the mean delay, sigma factor, and delta factor of each circuit element in the path.