Fraction Collector Peak Detection for Noisy Chromatograph Signals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Preparative liquid chromatographs face issues with noise signals from detectors like MS causing fraction collector malfunctions, leading to incorrect peak detection and reduced purity of collected components due to overlapping peaks and misidentification of peak ends.

Innovation Solution

A fraction collector controller adjusts both signal thresholds and the number of data points for peak detection, allowing precise identification of peak start and end points by comparing multiple data points against set thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual operation is used to switch fraction collection, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity and precision are worsened due to time-consuming operations and human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraction collection efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically identifies fraction peaks and determines collection timing without manual intervention. The control unit self-regulates the switching between collection vessels based on real-time detector signals, eliminating the need for operator intervention while maintaining high precision and productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit continuously monitors detector signals and uses this feedback to automatically adjust fraction collection timing. The system compares real-time UV absorbance or RI signals against predetermined thresholds to dynamically determine when to switch collection vessels, ensuring precise fraction separation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If automatic peak detection is implemented, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision may be worsened by inaccurate peak identification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraction collection speedVSAvoidpeak detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts detection parameters based on real-time signal characteristics. The control unit modifies detection thresholds and peak identification criteria according to the actual chromatogram shape and detector response, ensuring accurate peak detection across varying conditions while maintaining high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of the chromatogram signal before final peak identification. By pre-processing the detector data and establishing expected peak patterns based on retention times and signal intensity trends, the system ensures accurate peak detection before committing to fraction collection decisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If fixed collection timing is used, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision is worsened due to inability to adapt to retention time shifts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraction separation precisionVSAvoidcontrol mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit dynamically adjusts fraction collection timing based on actual peak detection results. Instead of fixed predetermined times, the system continuously adapts collection windows to match the actual retention times and peak shapes observed in real-time, ensuring precise fraction separation even when chromatographic conditions vary

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (collection timing, window duration) based on detected peak characteristics. When retention times shift or peak shapes change, the control unit automatically adjusts the collection parameters to maintain optimal fraction separation precision without requiring manual reconfiguration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances peak detection accuracy, reducing fraction collector malfunctions and ensuring high-purity component collection by accurately distinguishing between desired and unwanted components.

Implementation Method 1

detector for detecting UV absorbance or refractive index

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUV absorbance: Absorption (EM radiation)

Implementation Method 2

detector for detecting UV absorbance or refractive index

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRefractive index: Refraction

Implementation Method 3

preparative liquid chromatograph equipped with a fraction collector

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChromatography: Chromatography

Data Source

PatentEP3594680B1Fraction collector control device and preparative liquid chromatograph
Publication Date: 2026.04.29 SHIMADZU CORP
  • EP3594680B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3594680B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3594680B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A fraction collector controller includes a threshold storing part, a peak detecting part, a number-of-points-of-data setting part, and a control part. The peak detecting part retrieves, at regular intervals, signals that are from a detector of a liquid chromatograph and are used as points of data, and detects a start point and an end point of a peak by comparing a signal strength and/or an inclination of each of the points of data with the threshold(s) . The number-of-points-of-data setting part is configured to set a number of the points of data with which the peak detecting part compares the threshold(s) to detect a start point and an end point of a peak. The peak detecting part is configured to detect a start point or an end point of a peak when, as a condition, a number of successive points of data each of which is detected as a start point or an end point of a peak by comparison of a signal strength and/or an inclination of the point of data with the threshold(s) is equal to or larger than the number set by the number-of-points-of-data setting part.