Fractional Design Generation for Multilevel Factor Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional methods for stability testing in various industries, such as pharmaceuticals and mass spectrometry, require a large number of costly and time-consuming experimental trials due to the need to test all combinations of factors, which is not feasible with existing algorithms that primarily work with systems involving only 2 levels, leading to a demand for more efficient methods handling multilevel factors.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that generate orthogonal or nearly orthogonal and balanced experimental designs by decomposing factors into level sets and using Latin square matrices to create orthogonal arrays, which are then mapped to form active matrices for efficient testing of product characteristics across multiple partitions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If all combinations of factors are tested to ensure complete product characteristic evaluation, then measurement precision and reliability are improved, but the number of experimental runs increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct characteristic evaluation accuracyVSAvoidnumber of experimental runs
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the experimental design into multiple partitions, where each partition tests a specific subset of factor combinations. Instead of testing all combinations in one exhaustive set, the design divides the experimental space into manageable partitions that collectively cover the full range of factor levels across multiple runs, reducing the number of trials needed at any single partition point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces the dimension of time by conducting experiments across multiple partitions (e.g., different time points or stages). By distributing the testing of factor combinations across these temporal partitions, the system achieves comprehensive evaluation without requiring all combinations to be tested simultaneously, thereby reducing the experimental burden at each partition while maintaining overall measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If traditional algorithms are used that work with only 2 levels, then ease of operation is maintained, but adaptability to multilevel factors is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealgorithm simplicityVSAvoidhandling of multilevel factors
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter structure by representing multilevel factors as multiple binary factors. Each multilevel factor with L levels is decomposed into multiple binary factors that together encode the L levels. This transformation allows traditional binary-level algorithms to handle multilevel factors effectively, maintaining algorithm simplicity while achieving versatility in handling complex factor structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of time

If the number of experimental runs is reduced to lower costs, then loss of time and resources is decreased, but measurement precision may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexperimental testing durationVSAvoidproduct characteristic evaluation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary decomposition of multilevel factors into binary representations before conducting experiments. This preliminary action structures the experimental design in advance, allowing the system to efficiently determine which factor combinations to test at each partition. By pre-processing the factor structure, the system optimizes the experimental runs to achieve maximum measurement precision with minimal trials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from previous partition results to inform subsequent experimental decisions. By analyzing data from earlier partitions, the algorithm can identify patterns and relationships that reduce the need for exhaustive testing in later partitions, thereby maintaining measurement precision while reducing overall experimental duration and resource requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9746850B2Computer-implemented systems and methods for generating generalized fractional designs
Publication Date: 2017.08.29 SARTORIUS STEDIM DATA ANALYTICS AB
  • US9746850B2 patent drawing
  • US9746850B2 patent drawing
  • US9746850B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for creating a design plan to test a product characteristic are described. One or more factors, level corresponding to the factors, and partitions for testing the product characteristic are determined. For each partition, an active matrix is generated. The product characteristic can be tested at each partition using the levels for the factors specified by the corresponding active matrix.