Fracturing Fluid Density Control for Vertical Fracture Steering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional hydraulic fracturing methods are inefficient and costly, leading to uncontrolled vertical fracture growth, often resulting in fractures growing upward, which can waste resources and fail to target hydrocarbons effectively, especially when oil prices are low.

Innovation Solution

The method involves varying the specific gravity of fracking fluids and proppants to control the direction and rate of fracture growth by using materials like barite and hematite, and adjusting slurry densities in real-time based on pressure and seismic data to steer fractures vertically, ensuring that at least 80% of fracture growth can be directed upward or downward.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional fracking fluids with lower gradient than formation fracture gradient are used, then fractures can be created and proppants can hold them open, but fractures tend to grow upward uncontrollably

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefracture stabilityVSAvoidfracture growth control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the density parameter of the fracturing fluid by adding weighting materials (barite, hematite) to match or exceed the formation fracture gradient, thereby controlling fracture growth direction and preventing uncontrolled upward propagation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different fluid densities to different depth zones, using heavier fluids for deeper zones and lighter fluids for shallower zones to achieve localized control over fracture growth in each perforated interval

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If fluid is pumped into multiple perforated zones, then hydrocarbons can be extracted from various depths, but most fluid enters the shallowest zone due to upward fracture growth tendency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-zone extraction efficiencyVSAvoidfluid distribution efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent varies the density parameter of pumping fluids across different zones, using heavier fluids for deeper zones to overcome the upward growth tendency and ensure proper fluid distribution to all targeted perforated intervals

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs sequential pumping of different density fluids in a scheduled manner, alternating between heavier and lighter fluids to systematically control fracture growth and fluid distribution across multiple zones over time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Ease of operation

If heavier weighting materials are added to control fracture direction, then fracture growth control improves, but slurry density and pumping complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefracture direction controlVSAvoidslurry composition complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adjusts the density parameter of slurries by adding weighting materials to match formation fracture gradients, enabling control over fracture growth direction while managing slurry composition for effective pumping

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts slurry density by varying the concentration and type of weighting materials (barite, hematite) and proppant content to optimize fracture control while maintaining pumpability and managing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly improves the control over fracture growth direction, reduces costs by up to 10%, and ensures fractures stay within targeted hydrocarbon zones, minimizing upward growth into water zones and optimizing resource extraction.

Implementation Method 1

varying the specific gravity of a slurry and/or fluid being pumped into a well during a fracking operation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDensity gradient: Density Gradient

Implementation Method 2

adding proppant that sinks, is neutrally buoyant, or is buoyant relative to the slurry in which it is mixed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Implementation Method 3

proppant that is designed to migrate to the high side or low side or distribute equally along a vertical fracture

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitation: Gravitation

Implementation Method 4

injecting the rock with a pressurized liquid. High pressure injection of a fracking fluid into a wellbore creates cracks in rock formations

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure gradient: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentEP3887640B1System, method, and composition for controlling fracture growth
Publication Date: 2024.01.03 SAGE GEOSYSTEMS INC
  • EP3887640B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3887640B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3887640B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A system, composition and method for controlling vertical growth direction (up and down) of one or more fractures and/or rate of growth of one or more fractures by varying the specific gravity of one or more slurries or fluids being pumped into a well during a fracking operation.