Fracturing System Using Kinetic Energy Surges

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional hydraulic fracking technologies face challenges such as high energy consumption, long lead times to build pressure, and large water and proppant requirements, with low energy efficiency due to reliance on flow work for fracturing subterranean formations.

Innovation Solution

The system employs a fracking fluid comprising CO2, sand, and cleaning agents, accelerated to high velocity to create a water hammer effect, storing kinetic energy as potential energy during static flow and releasing it for three-dimensional fracture formation, using kinetic energy, internal energy, and flow work to reduce bitumen viscosity and facilitate hydrocarbon production without external heat sources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional hydraulic fracking uses high-pressure fluid injection to fracture subterranean formations, then fracturing effectiveness is improved, but energy consumption increases and energy efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefracturing effectivenessVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic pressure cycling where pressure is repeatedly applied and released to the fracking fluid. During pressurization, energy is stored in the compressed fluid; during depressurization, this stored energy is released as kinetic energy to enhance fracture propagation. This periodic action converts compressibility of the fluid into useful kinetic energy pulses, improving fracturing effectiveness while reducing overall energy consumption compared to continuous high-pressure injection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system exploits the compressibility of fracking fluid, which was previously considered a source of energy loss and reduced efficiency, and converts it into a beneficial mechanism. By repeatedly compressing and releasing the fluid, the system stores and releases energy that enhances fracture propagation kinetics. The compressibility that caused energy dissipation is now harnessed to create kinetic energy pulses that improve fracturing effectiveness while reducing the need for continuous high-energy input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

2Power

If conventional hydraulic fracking builds high pressure continuously to fracture formations, then fracturing power is improved, but lead time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefracturing powerVSAvoidlead time
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary compression of the fracking fluid during non-fracturing intervals, storing energy in the compressed fluid. This preliminary action prepares the system for rapid fracture propagation without requiring continuous high-pressure buildup. The pre-compressed fluid acts as a stored energy reservoir that can be quickly deployed when fracturing is needed, reducing the lead time required to build fracturing power while maintaining high fracturing effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses periodic pressure cycling to repeatedly compress and release the fracking fluid. Each compression cycle stores energy that is subsequently released as kinetic energy during fracture propagation. This periodic action allows the system to maintain high fracturing power when needed while utilizing off-periods for energy storage, thereby reducing the overall lead time compared to continuous high-pressure buildup requirements of conventional methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Productivity

If conventional hydraulic fracking uses large volumes of water and proppant, then fracture support and propagation are improved, but water and material requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefracture propagationVSAvoidwater and proppant requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the conventional mechanical approach of using large volumes of fluid to physically push proppant into fractures with a kinetic energy-based approach. By repeatedly compressing and releasing the fracking fluid, the system generates kinetic energy pulses that more efficiently propel proppant into fracture networks. This mechanical-to-kinetic energy substitution reduces the total volume of water and proppant needed while maintaining or improving fracture propagation effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the energy delivery parameters from continuous high-pressure mechanical forcing to periodic kinetic energy pulses. This parameter change allows for more efficient energy transfer to the proppant and fracture system, reducing the total quantity of water and proppant required. The kinetic energy pulses create more effective proppant placement with less material compared to conventional continuous high-volume injection methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces production costs and environmental impact while achieving efficient fracturing with high-pressure kinetic energy surges, eliminating the need for large amounts of high-pressure steam and external heat, and enhancing hydrocarbon recovery.

Implementation Method 1

accelerated to high velocity to create a water hammer effect, storing kinetic energy as potential energy during static flow and releasing it for three-dimensional fracture formation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWater hammer effect: Fluid Hammer

Implementation Method 2

The CO2 molecules, when subjected to a high surge pressure, compress under static flow conditions (i.e., before formation breakdown in fracking) thereby storing the kinetic energy as 'potential energy due to compression'

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 3

using kinetic energy, internal energy, and flow work to reduce bitumen viscosity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscous heating: Viscous Heating

Data Source

PatentUS11781409B2Fracturing system and method therefor
Publication Date: 2023.10.10 THE ANDERS FAMILY LIVING TRUST
  • US11781409B2 patent drawing
  • US11781409B2 patent drawing
  • US11781409B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A formation-fracking system has an gas/fluid accumulator, one or more pumps for pumping a fracking fluid, a fracking string extending to a subterranean formation and defining a fracking channel and a circulation channel, a valve subsystem coupling the pumps to the gas/fluid accumulator and the fracking string, and a bypass valve in fluid communication with the fracking channel and a fracking section. The valve subsystem alternately transitions between a first state for directing fracking fluid from the pumps and the gas/fluid accumulator to the fracking channel to create a kinetic-energy surge, and a second state for directing fracking fluid from the pumps to the gas/fluid accumulator for storing energy therein and for fracturing the formation using the kinetic-energy surge. The bypass valve enables a bypass channel fluidly connecting the fracking channel to the circulation channel in the first state and abruptly disables the bypass channel in the second state.