Frangible Cover Reinforcement Unit for Fence Post Footings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for creating footings for fence posts near segmental retaining walls face issues such as damage to reinforcing materials, safety hazards from cutting pipes, and loss or waste of covers, along with inefficiencies in packaging and storage.

Innovation Solution

A reinforcement unit comprising a base and a tower with a frangible cover that allows easy separation and stacking, enabling efficient installation and minimizing waste, while providing a stable footing for fence posts without damaging reinforcing materials.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If cardboard forms are used to create fence post cavities, then the forms can be easily shaped and installed, but the forms collapse under excessive loads from compacted backfill material and are adversely affected by moisture

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of shapingVSAvoidload bearing capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement unit is divided into distinct functional segments: a base portion for stability, a tower portion for cavity formation, and a frangible cover for protection. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function while maintaining overall structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement unit combines materials with complementary properties - the base and tower provide structural strength and stability, while the frangible cover provides protective functionality. This composite structure resolves the contradiction by integrating materials that collectively satisfy both ease of manufacture and load-bearing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If PVC or HDPE pipe is used to create cavities, then the forms have high strength and durability, but cutting the pipe creates safety hazards and requires additional construction steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveform durabilityVSAvoidinstallation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The cavity-forming tower is pre-manufactured in the correct size and shape, eliminating the need for on-site cutting or modification. This preliminary preparation resolves the contradiction by maintaining the durability of molded components while eliminating the safety hazards and additional steps associated with cutting pipe.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement unit is provided as a complete, pre-assembled segment containing the base, tower, and cover. This segmentation into ready-to-install units eliminates the need for additional construction steps like cutting and joining, thereby reducing installation complexity while maintaining the strength benefits of molded components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If open cavity forms are used, then the forms allow easy access for post installation, but the open holes create tripping hazards and can fill with debris

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccessibility for installationVSAvoidsafety hazards
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The frangible cover transitions from a closed protective state to an open accessible state through controlled fracturing. This dynamic transformation resolves the contradiction by providing safety protection during storage and transport, then enabling easy access for post installation when needed, while the fractured pieces remain contained within the cavity to prevent debris hazards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The frangible cover is designed to be discarded (fractured and dropped into the cavity) after serving its protective function. This resolves the contradiction by eliminating the need to manually remove covers, thereby maintaining safety during transport while providing easy access for installation, with the cover fragments becoming part of the cavity filling material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

4Ease of operation

If frangible covers are used on reinforcement units, then the covers protect the cavity and can be easily separated, but the covers may be lost on jobsites and create waste once removed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecover separationVSAvoidcover loss and waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The frangible cover's separation, which could lead to loss and waste, is converted into a benefit by designing it to fracture into small pieces that drop into the cavity. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining easy separation for installation access while preventing cover loss and eliminating waste, as the fractured cover fragments become part of the cavity filling material surrounding the post.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Data Source

PatentUS10557247B2Reinforcement unit and methods for creating a footing for supporting a structure
Publication Date: 2020.02.11 STRATA GEOSYSTEMS LLC
  • US10557247B2 patent drawing
  • US10557247B2 patent drawing
  • US10557247B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A reinforcement unit and methods are provided for creating footings for supporting structures, such as a fence post, using a reinforcement unit that has a tower that is generally perpendicular to a base, the tower defining a cavity for receiving a portion of the structure and an anchoring material. The reinforcement unit can include a top portion of a tower that is frangible. The base of the reinforcement unit can further include a pocket (or similar recess) substantially similar in width or diameter to the top portion of the tower such that a second identical reinforcement unit can be inverted and stacked on top of the second reinforcement unit. The methods can include placing the reinforcement unit on a layer of backfill material behind the wall face so that the unit is located adjacent the wall face and the base of the reinforcement unit extends away from the wall face, covering the base with at least one other layer of the backfill material, fracturing the top portion from the tower, such that the top portion drops into the cavity of the tower, depositing a bottom portion of the structure in the cavity of the tower, and filling the cavity of the tower with an anchoring material.