Fraud Alert Management Interface with Continuous Risk Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack effective means to detect and prevent fraud, particularly in interactive voice response (IVR) systems, where fraudsters can anonymously access account information, leading to significant identity theft and financial losses.

Innovation Solution

A user interface for fraud alert management is developed, featuring a visual display with panes that include an identifier, graphical threat risk representation, and a numeric score based on weighted factors, updated continuously, to help fraud analysts assess and manage potential threats.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If fraud detection systems are implemented in IVR systems, then fraud prevention capability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud prevention capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fraud detection system is segmented into multiple independent panes, each handling specific communication identifiers. This modular structure allows the system to process different types of communications separately while maintaining overall system reliability, and enables incremental implementation without overwhelming complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The graphical user interface acts as an intermediary between the complex fraud detection algorithms and the fraud analysts. It translates complex risk assessments into visual representations and simplified numeric scores, making the system's output accessible and actionable without requiring analysts to understand the underlying complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If continuous monitoring of multiple communication identifiers is performed, then fraud detection accuracy is improved, but information processing load increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoidinformation processing load
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and displays only the most critical information for each communication identifier in separate panes - the identifier itself, a graphical risk representation, and a numeric score. This extraction of essential information maintains detection accuracy while reducing the cognitive processing load on analysts by filtering out unnecessary data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The graphical representation uses color changes to visually encode risk levels, allowing analysts to quickly assess fraud risk without processing numerical data. This visual encoding improves detection accuracy by enabling rapid pattern recognition while significantly reducing information processing load through intuitive visual cues

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

3Loss of information

If detailed information about each communication is displayed, then fraud analysis quality is improved, but interface complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud analysis qualityVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Detailed information is segmented and organized into distinct panes, each dedicated to a specific communication identifier. This segmentation allows comprehensive information to be displayed without creating interface complexity, as each pane is a self-contained unit with consistent structure and clear separation from other panes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11538128B2User interface for fraud alert management
Publication Date: 2022.12.27 VERINT AMERICAS INC
  • US11538128B2 patent drawing
  • US11538128B2 patent drawing
  • US11538128B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A user interface for a fraud detection application includes a visual display; a plurality of panes displayed on the visual display, each pane including an identifier corresponding to a communication received; a graphical representation of a threat risk associated with the identifier; a numeric score associated with the threat risk, wherein the numeric score is a weighted score based on a plurality of predetermined factors updated substantially continuously. The graphical representation may include a status bar indicative of a threat risk associated with the identifier, the threat risk provided by the fraud detection algorithm and based on a weighted score. Each pane may include additional information about the identifier, such as a number of accounts accessed or attempted to be accessed associated with the identifier; a number of days the identifier has been active; a type of channel associated with the identifier; and a number of communications initiated by the identifier over a predetermined period of time. A user may access further information by activating a portion of the visual display to access additional information related to the threat risk. The communication may be a phone call, a chat, a web interaction or the like.