Fraud Detection via Asset Link Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Scalable fraud poses significant challenges to computer networks by involving sophisticated fraudsters who spend considerable time and resources to evade detection, creating complex attacks that are difficult to identify and monetize, leading to financial losses and data integrity issues.

Innovation Solution

The system detects fraudulent activities by analyzing assets such as hard assets, soft assets, and behavioral assets, including user activities, device data, and location information, using segmentation, clustering, and machine learning algorithms to identify patterns and trends, and assigns weights to determine the likelihood of fraudulent activities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional fraud detection mechanisms are used, then simple fraud cases can be detected, but sophisticated scalable fraud involving multiple actions and intermediate entities cannot be detected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection capabilityVSAvoidability to detect complex fraud patterns
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments fraud detection into multiple independent components: asset identification, activity monitoring, link analysis, and pattern recognition. Each component handles specific aspects of fraud detection, allowing the system to process complex multi-entity fraud schemes by breaking them down into detectable segments across different time periods and entity relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds temporal dimensionality by monitoring activities across multiple time periods and spatial dimensionality by tracking relationships across multiple entities and intermediaries. This multi-dimensional approach transforms simple transaction monitoring into comprehensive fraud pattern detection that can identify sophisticated schemes involving multiple actions and entities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive monitoring of multiple assets and activities is implemented, then fraud detection accuracy improves, but system complexity and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-identifying and categorizing assets (hard assets, soft assets, behavioral assets) before fraud occurs. Activities are pre-tagged and organized by type and time period, creating a structured foundation that simplifies subsequent fraud analysis and reduces computational complexity during actual detection operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary components including asset graphs, activity graphs, and link analysis mechanisms that mediate between raw data and fraud detection algorithms. These intermediaries organize complex multi-entity relationships into manageable structures, reducing system complexity while maintaining high detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If fraudsters use technology to hide their tracks and evade detection, then they can deploy fraudulent actions undetected, but this increases the difficulty of detecting fraudulent activities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraudster evasion capabilityVSAvoidfraud detection difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring activities across multiple time periods and using detected patterns to refine detection algorithms. When fraudsters attempt to hide tracks, the system's feedback loop analyzes changes in asset relationships and activity patterns over time, making it increasingly difficult for evasion techniques to succeed without triggering detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system converts the harm of fraudsters using technology to hide tracks into a benefit by analyzing the digital footprints and asset relationships that remain. Even when fraudsters attempt to conceal their actions, the system's comprehensive asset monitoring and link analysis transform these concealed attempts into detectable patterns through multi-entity relationship tracing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Data Source

PatentUS11038903B2System security configurations based on assets associated with activities
Publication Date: 2021.06.15 PAYPAL INC
  • US11038903B2 patent drawing
  • US11038903B2 patent drawing
  • US11038903B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various systems, mediums, and methods may involve a data engine with various components. For example, a system with the data engine may include a segmentation component, an asset preparation component, a clustering component, a variable generation component, and classification component. As such, the system may determine a number of assets associated with a number of activities of one or more accounts. Further, the system may determine various links associated with the number of assets. As such, the system may detect an attack and/or an attack trend associated with the one or more accounts based on the various links associated with the number assets. Further, the system may generate a notification that indicates the attack and/or the attack trend detected.