Integrated Authentication System for Fraud Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional authentication and fraud detection solutions focus on either authentication or fraud detection, failing to address both simultaneously, leading to increasing fraud rates in companies due to external and internal threats, particularly from contact centers.

Innovation Solution

A system combining behavioral analytics, real-time fraud detection, identity authentication, and two-factor authentication to assess call risks, identify fraudulent callers, and authenticate users through voice analysis and text message verification, reducing authentication friction and escalating suspected fraud automatically.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional authentication solutions focus only on identity verification, then authentication process is simple, but fraud detection capability is insufficient leading to increasing fraud rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines identity authentication and fraud detection into a single integrated system. The authentication module verifies caller identity while the fraud module simultaneously analyzes call characteristics, voice data, and behavioral patterns to detect fraudulent activities. This merging resolves the contradiction by achieving both reliable fraud detection and maintaining system manageability through unified architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs multiple functions simultaneously: authentication of caller identity, fraud detection through voice biometrics, behavioral analysis, and real-time risk assessment. This multi-functionality allows the system to address both authentication simplicity and fraud detection reliability without requiring separate complex systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If multiple authentication methods are implemented simultaneously, then fraud detection accuracy improves, but authentication friction increases for valid callers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoidauthentication friction
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial authentication actions based on risk assessment. For low-risk calls, only basic authentication is required. For higher-risk calls, additional verification steps such as voice biometrics or two-factor authentication are selectively applied. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining high fraud detection accuracy while minimizing authentication friction for legitimate low-risk callers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes authentication parameters based on call characteristics and risk scores. The fraud module analyzes various parameters (voice patterns, call metadata, behavioral data) and adjusts the level of authentication required accordingly. This allows high detection accuracy through comprehensive analysis while adapting the ease of operation by reducing friction for low-risk scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Speed

If real-time fraud detection is implemented, then fraud identification speed improves, but processing time for legitimate calls increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud identification speedVSAvoidcall processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary fraud assessment during call setup using available metadata and caller information before the full call conversation begins. The fraud module pre-analyzes call characteristics, ANI reputation, and account activity to generate an initial risk score. This preliminary action enables fast fraud identification for high-risk calls while minimizing processing time for legitimate low-risk calls that pass initial screening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

For low-risk calls that pass preliminary authentication and fraud screening, the system skips detailed fraud analysis steps and rapidly processes the call. The fraud module continuously monitors but can quickly clear legitimate calls without extensive analysis. This resolving the contradiction by maintaining high fraud identification speed for suspicious calls while reducing processing time for legitimate traffic through selective skipping of analysis steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Data Source

PatentUS11652917B2Systems and methods for authentication and fraud detection
Publication Date: 2023.05.16 VERINT AMERICAS INC
  • US11652917B2 patent drawing
  • US11652917B2 patent drawing
  • US11652917B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided to stop both external and internal fraud, ensure correct actions are being followed, and information is available to fraud teams for investigation. The system includes components that can address: 1) behavioral analytics (ANI reputation, IVR behavior, account activity)—this gives a risk assessment event before a call gets to an agent; 2) fraud detection—the ability to identify, in real time, if a caller is part of a fraudster cohort' and alert the agent and escalate to the fraud team; 3) identity authentication—the ability to identify through natural language if the caller is who they say they are; and 4) two factor authentication—the ability to send a text message to the caller and automatically process the response and create a case in the event of suspected fraud.