Fraud Detection System Using Data Clustering and Entity Linking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Detecting fraudulent activities in financial transactions is cumbersome and difficult, as existing methods lack efficiency in identifying suspicious relationships between entities and analyzing large volumes of data.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing data matching and clustering algorithms to load accounting and transaction data into a common data model, identifying links between entities, and generating reports with drill-down capabilities to facilitate the detection of potentially fraudulent activities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual investigation methods are used to detect fraudulent activities, then investigators can examine individual transactions, but the process becomes cumbersome and difficult when dealing with large volumes of data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection efficiencyVSAvoidinvestigation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the investigation process into distinct phases: automated data collection from multiple sources, algorithmic analysis to identify suspicious patterns, and manual review of only high-risk cases. This segmentation allows investigators to handle large volumes of data efficiently by automating the initial screening while maintaining thorough manual examination where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary automated analysis system that acts as a mediator between raw transaction data and human investigators. This intermediary system performs preliminary filtering and scoring of transactions using machine learning algorithms, presenting only the most suspicious cases to investigators, thereby reducing their workload while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If investigators manually analyze all transactions to uncover fraudulent activities, then comprehensive detection is possible, but the time and resources required become excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoidinvestigation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by automatically collecting and pre-processing data from multiple sources before investigator review. The system performs initial anomaly detection, entity resolution, and risk scoring on all transactions beforehand, so that when investigators examine cases, the most relevant information is already prepared and highlighted, significantly reducing their analysis time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual analysis process with an automated electronic system that uses machine learning algorithms to detect fraudulent patterns. This substitution maintains high detection accuracy by analyzing all transactions systematically, while reducing investigation time by presenting investigators with pre-filtered, high-confidence suspicious cases rather than requiring manual review of all transactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Loss of information

If comprehensive data analysis is performed on all transactions, then all fraudulent activities can be detected, but the computational resources and processing time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection completenessVSAvoiddata processing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by focusing computational resources on analyzing only the most suspicious transactions identified through automated screening. The system performs comprehensive analysis on a subset of high-risk cases rather than attempting to analyze every transaction in detail, maintaining detection completeness for fraudulent activities while improving processing efficiency by avoiding redundant analysis of normal transactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS7940899B2Fraud detection, risk analysis and compliance assessment
Publication Date: 2011.05.10 PWC PRODUCT SALES LLC
  • US7940899B2 patent drawing
  • US7940899B2 patent drawing
  • US7940899B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques using data matching and clustering algorithms are disclosed to aid investigators in detecting potentially fraudulent activity, performing risk analysis or assessing compliance with applicable regulations.