Fraud Detection System for Content Requests

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems fail to accurately and efficiently identify fraudulent requests for content, particularly in scenarios where client devices are controlled by malicious entities, leading to unauthorized access and advertisement fraud.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the receipt of client information and request information, analysis to determine fraudulence labels, and storage in a fraud detection database, which compares incoming requests against patterns of fraudulent activity to assess the validity of subsequent requests.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing systems are used to identify fraudulent requests, then the system operates with simple processing, but the accuracy of fraud detection is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fraud detection system is segmented into multiple independent components: a fraud detection module that analyzes request characteristics, a database module that stores fraud patterns, and a decision module that determines request validity. This segmentation allows each component to specialize in specific tasks, improving overall detection accuracy without overwhelming system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of request characteristics (IP address, user agent, request frequency, geographic location) before processing content delivery. By pre-evaluating these characteristics and comparing them against stored fraud patterns, the system identifies potential fraudulent requests early in the process, improving detection accuracy while maintaining efficient processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of energy

If fraudulent requests are not identified, then bandwidth is wasted on malicious traffic, but the system cannot protect against unauthorized access

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebandwidth wasteVSAvoidprotection against malicious access
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring request characteristics and comparing them against stored fraud patterns in the database. When fraudulent patterns are detected, the system provides feedback to block subsequent requests from the same source. This feedback mechanism reduces bandwidth waste by preventing malicious traffic while maintaining reliable protection through continuous pattern matching

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The fraud detection module acts as an intermediary between the request source and the content delivery system. It analyzes request characteristics and mediates whether requests should be processed or blocked, thereby protecting the system from malicious access while efficiently managing bandwidth by filtering fraudulent requests before they consume resources

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If all requests are processed without verification, then the system operates quickly, but fraudulent activity cannot be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverequest processing speedVSAvoidfraudulent activity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial verification by analyzing only key request characteristics (IP address, user agent, request frequency) rather than examining every detail of each request. This partial action approach maintains high processing speed while effectively identifying fraudulent patterns, thereby reducing fraudulent activity without significantly impacting productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual or simple mechanical filtering with automated pattern recognition algorithms that analyze request characteristics and compare them against stored fraud patterns. This substitution enables rapid automated detection of fraudulent activity, maintaining high processing speed while effectively reducing harmful fraudulent requests through intelligent analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12261882B2Identifying fraudulent requests for content
Publication Date: 2025.03.25 YAHOO AD TECH LLC
  • US12261882B2 patent drawing
  • US12261882B2 patent drawing
  • US12261882B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One or more computing devices, systems, and/or methods are provided. A request for content associated with a device and/or a set of request information associated with the request for content may be received. A content item may be transmitted to the device. A set of client information associated with the device may be received. The set of client information may be analyzed to determine a fraudulence label associated with the request for content. Fraud detection information generated based upon the set of request information, the set of client information and/or the fraudulence label may be stored in a fraud detection database. A second request for content associated with a second device and/or a second set of request information associated with the second request for content may be received. A second fraudulence label may be determined based upon the second set of request information and/or the fraud detection database.