Fraud Detection Before Entry-Code Detection for Faster Facility Entry

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fraud detection systems take a long time to complete processing after detecting a detection target, such as a code for facility entry, due to the need for fraud detection, which prolongs the entry process.

Innovation Solution

A fraud detection system that determines whether a predetermined action has been performed by a user before detecting the target, executes fraud detection on the user's terminal based on stored identification information, and completes processing upon target detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If fraud detection is executed after detecting the code, then the reliability of entry control is improved, but the time required for entry processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveentry control reliabilityVSAvoidentry processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system executes fraud detection in advance by monitoring predetermined actions (such as code generation or display actions) before the code detection occurs. This preliminary fraud detection allows the system to prepare verification results ahead of time, so when the code is actually detected, the entry process can be completed quickly without waiting for fraud detection to finish.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the timing of fraud detection execution based on user actions. Instead of a fixed timing, the fraud detection is triggered by detecting specific user actions (such as generating or displaying a code), allowing the system to optimize the detection timing and reduce unnecessary waiting time during the entry process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If fraud detection is executed every time a code is detected, then the security against fraudulent entry is improved, but the processing efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoidentry processing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs fraud detection preliminarily by monitoring user actions such as code generation or display. This allows the system to identify potential fraud cases before code detection occurs, enabling efficient processing by having verification results ready in advance and avoiding delays during actual entry operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically monitors user actions and executes fraud detection based on detected predetermined actions without requiring manual intervention. This self-service approach maintains high security by continuously verifying user behavior while improving efficiency through automated processing that eliminates the need for human review in each case.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP4033382B1Fraud detection system, fraud detection device, fraud detection method, and program
Publication Date: 2025.07.30 RAKUTEN GROUP INC
  • EP4033382B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4033382B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4033382B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A fraud detection system (S) executes predetermined processing when a detection target is detected by using a detection device (40). Action determination means (201) determines, before the detection target is detected, whether a predetermined action has been performed by a user having a user terminal (20). Fraud detection means (103) executes, when it is determined that the predetermined action has been performed, fraud detection on the user based on identification information stored in the user terminal (20). Execution means (303) executes, when the detection target is detected, the predetermined processing based on an execution result of the fraud detection.