Fraud Detection Graph Visualization for Payment Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fraud detection systems in payment card transaction networks primarily focus on individual transactions and fail to analyze patterns or trends, leading to undetected fraudulent activities and increased network load, with automated monitoring systems sometimes failing unnoticed.

Innovation Solution

A computing device and method that receive and generate graphs from fraud data elements to visually present trends and anomalies to users, enabling real-time detection and analysis of fraudulent events by aggregating and correlating data from multiple systems, including transaction authorization, detection, and confirmation systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If fraud detection systems monitor transactions one at a time, then individual transaction analysis is performed, but patterns and trends associated with fraudulent transactions cannot be detected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoidpattern information
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments fraud detection into two complementary components: (1) transaction-level analysis by the fraud detection system, and (2) pattern-level analysis by the fraud monitoring system that aggregates data across multiple transactions. This segmentation allows both individual transaction monitoring and holistic pattern recognition to occur simultaneously, resolving the contradiction between detailed analysis and information loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The fraud monitoring system acts as an intermediary between the fraud detection system and human analysts. It collects, aggregates, and visualizes fraud data from multiple transactions, transforming raw data into actionable pattern insights without losing critical information. This intermediary layer enables pattern recognition while preserving the integrity of individual transaction analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If fraud detection systems do not monitor themselves, then system operations proceed uninterrupted, but system failures go unnoticed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem operational continuityVSAvoidsystem failure detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The fraud monitoring system implements a feedback mechanism that continuously monitors the fraud detection system's performance and status. By collecting data on system operations, rule executions, and transaction processing, the monitoring system provides real-time feedback about system health, enabling automatic alerting when failures or anomalies occur without interrupting normal fraud detection operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If multiple data systems operate independently, then each system maintains its own data integrity, but fraudulent events cannot be correlated across systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata integrityVSAvoidcross-system correlation information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The fraud monitoring system merges data from multiple independent systems including the fraud detection system, authorization systems, and other payment network components. By consolidating these data streams into a unified monitoring framework, the system maintains the integrity of source systems while enabling cross-system correlation of fraudulent events through centralized data aggregation and pattern analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10586234B2System and method for detecting fraudulent network events
Publication Date: 2020.03.10 MASTERCARD INT INC
  • US10586234B2 patent drawing
  • US10586234B2 patent drawing
  • US10586234B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computing device for detecting fraudulent network events in a payment card transaction network is provided. The computing device includes a processor and a display device. The computing device is programmed to receive a first plurality of fraud data elements associated with a plurality of payment card transactions from a fraud detection system. The computing device is also programmed to generate a first graph from the first plurality of fraud data elements. The computing device is further programmed to receive a first plurality of data elements associated with the plurality of payment card transactions from a second system. The computing device is also programmed to generate a second graph from the first plurality of data elements and display both of the first graph and the second graph simultaneously to a user on the display device, such that the user to detect fraudulent events in the payment card transaction network.