Automated Fraud Detection System for Insurance Claims

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for detecting fraud in industries such as insurance, banking, and healthcare are inefficient due to the limited number of investigators and the difficulty in identifying fraudulent requests, leading to high false-positive rates and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

A computer-based system that assesses the potential for fraud using multiple techniques, including identity searches, model comparisons, and business rule evaluations, to determine a fraud potential indicator, which can be used to prioritize investigations and reduce unnecessary reviews.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual investigation by adjustors and investigators is used to detect fraud, then detection accuracy may be improved, but resource limitations and high costs worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoidnumber of investigators
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an automated fraud detection system that acts as an intermediary between fraud requests and human investigators. This system uses multiple fraud potential detection techniques including identity searches, model comparisons, and business rule evaluations to pre-screen requests, allowing limited human resources to focus only on high-risk cases while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If manual investigation of every request is performed, then fraud detection completeness is improved, but time consumption and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection completenessVSAvoidinvestigation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary automated screening of fraud requests using multiple detection techniques before human investigation. The system evaluates fraud potential indicators, compares requests against fraud models, and performs identity searches in advance, so that only requests requiring human review are forwarded to investigators, significantly reducing overall processing time while maintaining completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If automated fraud detection systems are used, then processing efficiency is improved, but false-positive rates worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection efficiencyVSAvoidfalse-positive rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple fraud potential detection techniques including identity searches, model comparisons, and business rule evaluations into an integrated system. This multi-technique approach cross-validates findings and reduces false positives by requiring convergence of evidence from different detection methods before flagging a request as potentially fraudulent, while maintaining high processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS7827045B2Systems and methods for assessing the potential for fraud in business transactions
Publication Date: 2010.11.02 COMPUTER SCIENCES CORP
  • US7827045B2 patent drawing
  • US7827045B2 patent drawing
  • US7827045B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are provided for assessing the potential for fraud of an insurance claim. In some embodiments, request data may be provided to a computer system. In some embodiments, at least one fraud potential indicator may be assessed to the request data from at least one comparison of at least one request data element to at least one fraud model. In some embodiments, a fraud potential indicator may be an estimate of the potential for fraud in an insurance claim. In some embodiments, at least one fraud potential indicator for request data may be assessed based on at least one comparison of at least one request data element to additional insurance data. Some embodiments may include assessing at least one fraud potential indicator for request data based on at least one fraud potential indicator.