Fraud Detection Decision Matrix for Payment Security

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods fail to effectively identify and prevent fraudulent retail transactions in real-time, leading to financial losses for retailers due to the convenience of online and in-store purchasing processes that can facilitate unauthorized use of payment forms.

Innovation Solution

A fraud detection system that uses computing devices to analyze purchase data, determine value and risk categories, and generate decision matrices to identify fraudulent transactions, allowing retailers to prevent or review suspicious transactions based on generated fraud detection scores and feature binning algorithms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If online retail websites allow customers to make purchases without signing in or use guest options, then customer convenience is improved, but fraudulent transactions are facilitated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer convenienceVSAvoidtransaction security
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary fraud detection system that sits between the customer and the transaction completion. This system analyzes multiple data points (device information, purchase patterns, shipping addresses) without requiring customer authentication, thereby maintaining convenience while adding a security layer that mediates the transaction risk

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary fraud assessment actions before the transaction is finalized. By evaluating risk factors in advance and making pre-decisions about transaction allowability, the system prevents fraudulent transactions from completing while allowing legitimate ones to proceed without interruption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If retailers require ID verification at store pickup, then transaction security is improved, but fraudulent purchases are still facilitated through stolen ID cards

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction securityVSAvoidfraudulent transaction impact
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the fraud detection process into multiple independent analysis components: device fingerprinting, purchase pattern analysis, shipping address validation, and real-time risk scoring. Each segment evaluates a specific aspect of transaction legitimacy, and their combined results provide comprehensive fraud detection that goes beyond simple ID verification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters used for fraud detection from static information (ID cards) to dynamic multi-dimensional parameters including device characteristics, browsing behavior, purchase history, and shipping destination patterns. This parameter transformation enables detection of fraudulent transactions even when stolen identification is presented

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If retailers implement traditional fraud detection methods, then some fraudulent transactions are identified, but real-time prevention is not achieved leading to financial losses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoidtransaction processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical fraud detection methods (manual review, sequential verification steps) with an automated electronic system that processes multiple data sources simultaneously. The computing device evaluates all risk factors in parallel and generates real-time decisions, eliminating the time delays associated with traditional step-by-step verification processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11494775B2Methods and apparatus for payment fraud detection
Publication Date: 2022.11.08 WALMART APOLLO LLC
  • US11494775B2 patent drawing
  • US11494775B2 patent drawing
  • US11494775B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This application relates to apparatus and methods for identifying fraudulent transactions. In some examples, a computing device generates a decision matrix to identify fraudulent transactions. To generate the decision matrix, the computing device may determine scores for a plurality of transactions, and may determine transaction categories for each transaction based on the scores. The computing device may also determine a number of predictable features based on applying machine learning techniques to the transactions. A risk category is then determined for the number of predictable features. The computing device generates the decision matrix based on the transaction categories and the risk categories. In some examples, the computing device applies the generated decision matrix to an ongoing purchase transaction to determine if the ongoing purchase transaction is fraudulent. In some examples, the computing device prevents completion of the purchase transaction if the purchase transaction is determined to be fraudulent.