Fraud Detection Platform Using Merchant Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack an effective method to identify fraudulent transactions, particularly in cross-border contexts, where merchants in other countries are involved, and struggle to differentiate between high-risk and high-frequency merchants, leading to inefficiencies in fraud detection and prevention.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that uses a risk management platform to establish and apply fraud rules through a graphical user interface, identifying high-risk and high-frequency merchants based on transaction data, and employs machine learning algorithms to determine fraudulent transaction parameters, thereby enhancing real-time fraud detection and prevention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional fraud detection methods are used, then false positives increase, but fraud detection accuracy remains insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoidfalse positive rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments merchants into different risk categories (high-risk, high-frequency, and normal merchants) based on their transaction patterns and characteristics. This segmentation allows the application of differentiated fraud rules to each category, improving detection accuracy while reducing false positives by not applying stringent rules uniformly to all merchants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts fraud detection rules based on real-time transaction data and merchant behavior patterns. Fraud rules are not static but adapt to changing merchant risk profiles and transaction characteristics, enabling more accurate fraud detection that responds to evolving fraud patterns while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive fraud rules are applied to all merchants, then fraud detection coverage improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection coverageVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different levels of fraud detection scrutiny to different merchant segments. High-risk merchants undergo more comprehensive fraud rule evaluation, while high-frequency merchants and normal merchants are subject to differentiated rule sets. This local quality approach ensures thorough fraud detection coverage for vulnerable segments without unnecessarily complicating the system for lower-risk merchants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements fraud rules selectively based on merchant category rather than applying all possible rules universally. By tailoring the extent of fraud rule application to merchant risk profiles, the system achieves adequate fraud detection coverage where needed while avoiding excessive complexity in areas where simpler monitoring suffices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If real-time fraud detection is implemented, then fraud prevention effectiveness improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud prevention effectivenessVSAvoidtransaction processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of merchants into risk categories using historical transaction data and established risk criteria. This preliminary action enables the system to pre-determine which fraud rule sets to apply, allowing real-time fraud detection to proceed efficiently by avoiding unnecessary evaluation of all possible rules for every transaction, thus maintaining both effectiveness and speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240104574A1Systems and methods for improved fraud detection
Publication Date: 2024.03.28 VISA INTERNATIONAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION
  • US20240104574A1 patent drawing
  • US20240104574A1 patent drawing
  • US20240104574A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method comprising providing a graphical user interface for user selection of fraud rules that comprises fraud transaction parameters determined based on transaction parameters included in a plurality of known fraudulent transactions. The GUI also comprises high risk merchants with a fraud rate that exceeds a threshold fraud rate. The method includes receiving a user selection of fraud rules relating to at least the fraud transaction parameters, the high risk merchants, and the high frequency merchants. The method includes receiving test transaction data including at least one transaction parameter and at least one merchant associated with the test transaction, applying the fraud rules to the received transaction data to identify probable fraudulent transactions.