Automated Fraud Detection Rule Generation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for detecting credit card fraud are time-consuming and expensive, and existing technologies lack efficient automated mechanisms to quickly identify fraudulent transactions, especially for debit and gift card transactions which have limited protection, posing a significant hardship for consumers.

Innovation Solution

An automated fraud detection system that generates and deploys fraud rules based on user interaction with a rule interface, allowing for rapid creation and activation of conditional statements to evaluate transactions, thereby improving the efficiency of fraud detection across various card types.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated fraud detection systems are implemented, then fraud detection speed and efficiency are improved, but system complexity and initial costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables fraud detection rules to be self-generated through automated analysis of transaction patterns and fraud cases. The rule generation engine automatically creates detection rules without requiring manual programming by analysts, allowing the system to serve itself in creating its detection capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-generates fraud detection rules by analyzing historical transaction data and fraud patterns before new fraudulent transactions occur. This preliminary rule creation allows the system to be ready to detect fraud immediately when suspicious transactions happen, improving detection speed without increasing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If more staff work twenty-four hours a day three-hundred and sixty-five days a year to detect fraud, then fraud detection coverage is improved, but operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection coverageVSAvoidoperational costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of human analysts working continuous shifts with an automated computer-based fraud detection system. The rule generation engine and transaction monitoring system automatically analyze transactions 24/7 without human intervention, maintaining continuous fraud detection coverage while eliminating the need for round-the-clock staffed operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

An automated rule generation engine acts as an intermediary between transaction data and fraud detection decisions. This intermediary system processes transactions and generates detection rules automatically, replacing the need for human analysts to directly examine each transaction, thereby reducing operational costs while maintaining detection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If manual fraud rule creation is used, then system simplicity is maintained, but fraud detection effectiveness decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidfraud detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables fraud detection rules to be self-generated through automated analysis of transaction patterns and fraud cases. The rule generation engine automatically creates detection rules without requiring manual programming by analysts, allowing the system to serve itself in creating its detection capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes detection parameters and rules based on analyzed fraud patterns and transaction characteristics. Rather than using fixed manual rules, the system adapts detection parameters automatically based on data-driven insights, improving detection accuracy while maintaining ease of use through the graphical interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10990970B2Automated fraud detection
Publication Date: 2021.04.27 NCR ATLEOS CORP
  • US10990970B2 patent drawing
  • US10990970B2 patent drawing
  • US10990970B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Transaction information for a card transaction is automatically and selectively rendered to a screen of a display presented to a user. The user can edit zero or more operators and selected values provided in the screen and save any such edits. When saved, the transaction information and any edited operators and/or selected values are used to generate a rule for a fraud detection system for immediate application. Subsequent card transactions are evaluated in view of the generated rule to automatically detect any fraudulent transactions present in the card transactions.