Fraud Detection Rule Population Engine

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Merchants face challenges in efficiently detecting fraudulent transactions, as existing fraud detection systems can be compromised, and managing numerous merchant profiles becomes unwieldy, leading to significant resource expenditure and potential financial losses.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for generating and automatically populating fraud detection rules and merchant profiles with a core set of rules, allowing for efficient management and application across multiple profiles, reducing the need for manual intervention and minimizing transcription errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If merchants manually review each transaction to detect fraud, then fraud detection accuracy improves, but time consumption and resource expenditure increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical review of transactions with an automated fraud detection system that uses algorithms and rules to evaluate transactions automatically. This substitution maintains fraud detection capability while eliminating the time-consuming manual process, allowing the system to process transactions at machine speed without human intervention for each individual transaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The fraud detection system enables merchants to self-serve by automatically detecting and flagging fraudulent transactions without requiring manual review. The system serves itself by using predefined rules and algorithms to autonomously identify potential fraud, reducing the need for merchant staff to manually examine each transaction while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If merchants establish numerous merchant profiles to meet business requirements, then adaptability improves, but profile management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebusiness requirement fulfillmentVSAvoidprofile management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal set of core fraud detection rules that can be applied across multiple merchant profiles simultaneously. Instead of creating and managing separate rule sets for each merchant profile, the system uses a single universal rule set that adapts to different business requirements through configuration options, thereby reducing management complexity while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the management of fraud detection rules by allowing a single core rule set to serve multiple merchant profiles. This consolidation reduces the number of separate profiles and rules that need to be managed individually, simplifying the overall system structure while still accommodating diverse business requirements through the flexible application of the unified rule set.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If fraud detection rules are modified to address compromised systems, then security improves, but the risk of rule errors and misidentification increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidrule accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms that allow the fraud detection system to learn from outcomes and adjust rule applications accordingly. By incorporating feedback loops where transaction outcomes feed back into rule refinement, the system can maintain security while reducing rule errors over time, as the feedback helps identify and correct misidentifications without requiring frequent manual rule modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary actions by establishing core fraud detection rules in advance that are designed to be robust and error-resistant. These pre-configured rules undergo validation and testing before deployment, reducing the likelihood of rule errors and misidentifications while maintaining security. The preliminary setup includes default configurations that have been optimized to minimize false positives and negatives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10643180B2Fraud detection system automatic rule population engine
Publication Date: 2020.05.05 VISA INTERNATIONAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION
  • US10643180B2 patent drawing
  • US10643180B2 patent drawing
  • US10643180B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the invention are directed to a fraud detection system that stores fraud detection rules and merchant profiles. The fraud detection system allows a user to designate fraud detection rules as core fraud detection rules, and the fraud detection system can automatically populate new profiles with the user's core fraud detection rules.