Fraud Detection System Using Time-Based Pattern Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing technologies struggle to effectively identify and prevent fraud in transaction data, particularly in cases where fraud patterns emerge over a delineated, time-based frequency, leading to potential financial and reputational losses.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize a machine learning model suite to analyze transaction data characteristics aggregated over predetermined time periods, identify outliers, and determine if they indicate a fraud attack. The system catalogues fraud patterns, determines satisfaction of rules by these patterns, and notifies entities of potential fraud attacks, while also retraining the machine learning models in real-time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional fraud detection methods are used, then the system is simple to operate, but the detection precision and ability to identify time-based fraud patterns deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments fraud detection into multiple specialized machine learning models, each targeting specific fraud patterns or time periods. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high detection precision for different fraud types while maintaining manageable complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds a time dimension to fraud detection by analyzing transaction patterns across predetermined time periods. This dimensional transformation enables the detection of time-based fraud patterns that traditional methods miss, improving precision without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If real-time fraud detection and model retraining is implemented, then the reliability of fraud detection improves, but the computational resources and processing time required increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection reliabilityVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic retraining of machine learning models at predetermined intervals rather than continuous retraining. This periodic action maintains detection reliability by regularly updating models with new fraud patterns while significantly reducing computational resource consumption compared to continuous retraining.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning models automatically retrain themselves using newly identified fraud patterns without requiring external intervention. This self-service capability maintains high reliability by continuously adapting to new threats while optimizing resource usage through automated model management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive transaction data analysis is performed, then the detection precision improves, but the processing speed deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud pattern identification precisionVSAvoidtransaction processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis by pre-processing and aggregating transaction data into predetermined time periods before detailed fraud pattern analysis. This preliminary action organizes data in advance, enabling faster processing during actual fraud detection while maintaining comprehensive analysis precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different analysis depths to different data segments based on local characteristics. High-priority transactions or anomalous patterns receive comprehensive analysis while normal transactions receive streamlined processing, maintaining overall detection precision while improving average processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250131435A1System and Method for Detecting and Mitigating Real-Time Fraud Attacks Using Aggregated Consortium Data for Transactions
Publication Date: 2025.04.24 SOCURE INC
  • US20250131435A1 patent drawing
  • US20250131435A1 patent drawing
  • US20250131435A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are a system and methodology for fraud detection and prevention to minimize an ongoing effect of fraud attack. The minimization is rooted in leveraging real-time recognition for delineated, time-based frequency for patterning within transaction data in which such patterning can be indicative of fraud. Once the recognition is performed, affected entities can be notified such that they may then institute efforts to thwart effects of the fraud attack. Still further, the recognition can serve to mitigate effects of fraud attack for subsequent iterations of transaction data by automating, in real-time, disapproval of transactions infected with the aforementioned patterning.