Online Fraud Mitigation Engine Risk Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Financial services organizations face challenges in detecting fraudulent online transactions due to the ease of hiding identities on the internet, with Internet-related fraud increasing significantly, necessitating effective methods to create a safe and secure online environment.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for determining fraudulent online transactions using an Online Fraud Mitigation Engine (OFME) that computes a risk score based on input parameters and rules, including travel velocity and transaction frequency, to flag potentially fraudulent transactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional fraud detection methods are used, then implementation is simple, but detection accuracy is insufficient due to ease of hiding identities online

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fraud detection system is segmented into multiple independent analysis modules: IP address analysis module, travel velocity calculation module, transaction frequency analysis module, and risk scoring module. Each module processes specific aspects of transaction data independently, then combines results to achieve comprehensive fraud detection with higher accuracy while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from traditional single-dimension fraud detection to multi-dimensional analysis by incorporating geographic location data, temporal data (transaction frequency), and velocity data (travel velocity between locations). This dimensional expansion enables more accurate fraud detection by analyzing transactions from multiple perspectives simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive transaction analysis is performed, then fraud detection accuracy improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoidtransaction processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating and storing baseline data such as user travel patterns, typical transaction frequencies, and geographic information before actual fraud detection occurs. During transaction processing, the system compares real-time data against these pre-established baselines, enabling fast fraud assessment without extensive real-time computation, thus reducing processing time while maintaining high detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The fraud detection system implements self-service mechanisms by automatically gathering and analyzing multiple data dimensions (IP address, location, velocity, frequency) without requiring manual intervention. The system autonomously computes risk scores and makes fraud determination, eliminating time-consuming manual review processes while comprehensive analysis is performed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS7708200B2Fraud risk advisor
Publication Date: 2010.05.04 DIGITAL ENVOY INC
  • US7708200B2 patent drawing
  • US7708200B2 patent drawing
  • US7708200B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fraudulent business transaction application (FBTA) is provided for monitoring application based fraud. When a consumer supplies account access information in order to carry out an Internet business transaction, the FBTA uses an online fraud mitigation engine to detect phishing intrusions and identity theft. Methods are also provided for calculating travel velocity and transaction frequency, which are useful for determining a fraudulent transaction.