Free-Form Master Lens Surface Profile Derivation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for manufacturing liquid-crystal-based planar optical components, such as diffraction or polarization gratings and lenses, are limited by the inability to record the optical function of free-form master lenses, restricting their widespread use due to deviations in the recorded optical function compared to the desired function.

Innovation Solution

A method for deriving a surface profile of a free-form master lens that compensates for deviations by determining phase differences between the desired and actual optical functions, allowing for the correction of the surface profile to achieve the desired optical function, enabling the manufacturing of planar optical components with the same or substantially the same optical function as the free-form master lens.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a free-form test lens is used for holographic patterning, then the manufacturing flexibility and optical function customization are improved, but the recorded optical function deviates from the desired function

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical function customizationVSAvoidoptical function accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by calculating and compensating for optical deviations before the actual holographic patterning process. The method computes the deviation between desired and actual optical functions in advance, then uses this information to pre-correct the master lens surface profile or adjust patterning parameters, ensuring accurate optical function recording from the first attempt rather than through trial-and-error iterations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional spherical master lenses are used, then the manufacturing process is simple and well-established, but the optical function recording is limited and cannot achieve free-form optical functions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidoptical function recording capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by transitioning from spherical to free-form master lens surface profiles. This fundamental parameter change in lens geometry enables the recording of free-form optical functions that cannot be achieved with conventional spherical lenses, while the underlying holographic patterning process remains substantially unchanged, maintaining manufacturing simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If trial and error testing is performed to achieve desired optical function, then the optical function accuracy can be improved, but the production time and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical function accuracyVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies feedback by implementing a computational model that predicts the deviation between desired and actual optical functions based on the master lens surface profile and patterning parameters. This feedback mechanism allows for real-time calculation and correction of deviations, eliminating the need for physical trial-and-error testing and enabling first-pass accuracy in optical function recording.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for the cost- and time-efficient production of free-form master lenses, reducing the need for trial and error and enabling their use in various applications like optical communication systems and virtual reality glasses, by accurately replicating the desired optical function onto photo-alignment layers.

Implementation Method 1

The patterning of these photo-alignment layers is typically done by means of holographic patterning. Holographic patterning uses two circularly polarized light beams such as laser beams to illuminate the photo-alignment layers.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHolographic patterning: Photography

Implementation Method 2

The photo-alignment layers contain photo-sensitive material whose molecules change their orientation when being illuminated with light, for example, visible light or UV light which in turn causes the molecules of the liquid-crystal material to follow their orientation alignment.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhoto-alignment: Photochromism

Implementation Method 3

the liquid-crystal material deposited on top of the patterned photo-alignment layer deflects the incident light beam. In other words, the pattern photo-alignment layer defines the optical function of the optical component.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLiquid crystal optical deflection: Liquid Crystals

Data Source

PatentUS20240427196A1A method for deriving a surface profile of a free-form master lens for patterning photo-alignment layers of planar optical components
Publication Date: 2024.12.26 UNIV GENT
  • US20240427196A1 patent drawing
  • US20240427196A1 patent drawing
  • US20240427196A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is provided for deriving a surface profile of a free-form master lens for patterning one or two photo-alignment layers of a planar optical component. The method includes obtaining a desired optical function of the planar optical component; and obtaining an actual optical function of the planar optical component, the actual optical function being described as recorded using a free-form test lens with a surface profile configured to provide the desired optical function. The method includes estimating a deviation between the desired optical function and the actual optical function; and correcting the surface profile of the free-form test lens using the estimated deviation, thereby deriving a surface profile for the free-form master lens.