Free-Hand Ultrasonic Array With Inertial Positioning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional non-destructive inspection methods, such as X-Y scanners and hand-held probes, are time-consuming, costly, and difficult to use on complex or curved surfaces, particularly when inspecting structures like aircraft wings, and often produce low-quality images.

Innovation Solution

A free-hand inspection apparatus comprising an array of elements and an inertial sensor that measures acceleration and angular rotation, allowing for rapid, low-cost, and versatile non-destructive inspection by correlating inspection data with determined positions and orientations of the array relative to the structure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a single element is scanned across the surface of the structure, then inspection coverage is achieved, but inspection time becomes substantial

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection coverageVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the inspection function into multiple independent elements arranged in an array, allowing simultaneous inspection of multiple locations rather than sequential scanning of a single element. This segmentation enables parallel data collection across the structure surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from one-dimensional sequential scanning to two-dimensional array-based simultaneous measurement by adding spatial distribution of multiple elements. This dimensional change allows coverage of the entire inspection area at once rather than point-by-point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If expensive and sophisticated X-Y scanners are used, then C-scan images are produced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidscanner complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the positioning function from complex mechanical X-Y scanners and replaces it with inertial sensors that independently measure position and orientation. This separation eliminates the need for sophisticated mechanical scanning systems while maintaining positioning accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical X-Y scanner systems with an array of sensors and inertial measurement units. This substitution transitions from mechanical positioning to sensor-based positioning, significantly reducing device complexity while maintaining inspection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If hand-held devices with encoder wheels are used, then portability is maintained, but image quality becomes low

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveportabilityVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple sensor types (inertial sensors, position sensors, and inspection elements) into a single integrated hand-held device. This combination allows the device to maintain portability while achieving high image quality through sophisticated multi-sensor data fusion and correlation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Measurement precision

If X-Y bridges are mounted to the surface, then better images are produced, but setup time becomes significant

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidsetup time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the inspection device to determine its own position and orientation autonomously using inertial sensors and position sensors, eliminating the need for pre-mounted X-Y bridges or external positioning infrastructure. The device is self-sufficient in positioning itself relative to the structure being inspected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

5Measurement precision

If X-Y bridges are used for manual scanning, then inspection accuracy is improved, but operation becomes time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection accuracyVSAvoidscanning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables continuous inspection across the entire structure surface simultaneously using the array of elements, rather than sequential point-by-point scanning. This continuous parallel measurement maintains high accuracy while dramatically reducing total inspection time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

6Measurement precision

If X-Y bridges are used, then inspection precision is improved, but usability on complex curvatures becomes problematic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection precisionVSAvoidadaptability to complex surfaces
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses dynamic inertial sensors that continuously measure acceleration and angular rotation to adapt to any surface geometry in real-time. This dynamic positioning system can accommodate complex curvatures and varying surface orientations that rigid X-Y bridges cannot handle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the positioning parameters from fixed mechanical coordinates to dynamic inertial measurements including acceleration and angular rotation. This parameter transformation allows the system to adapt to any surface geometry by continuously updating position and orientation data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables rapid collection of high-quality two-dimensional or three-dimensional inspection data without the need for complex mounting or repetitive motion, reducing costs and improving inspection efficiency on various structures, including those with complex curvatures.

Implementation Method 1

The inertial sensor may be for measuring acceleration and angular rotation rate in X, Y, and Z directions of the array

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertial measurement: Accelerometer

Implementation Method 2

The array may comprise a plurality of elements for transmitting and receiving inspection signals towards and from a structure being inspected

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltrasonic inspection: Ultrasound

Implementation Method 3

produce C-scan images of ultrasonic or eddy current data of the structure being inspected

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy current inspection: Eddy Currents

Data Source

PatentUS7848894B2Non-destructive inspection apparatus
Publication Date: 2010.12.07 THE BOEING CO
  • US7848894B2 patent drawing
  • US7848894B2 patent drawing
  • US7848894B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A free-hand inspection apparatus for non-destructively inspecting a structure includes an array and an inertial sensor. The array includes a plurality of elements for transmitting and receiving inspection signals towards and from a structure being inspected. The inertial sensor measures acceleration and angular rotation rate in X, Y, and Z directions of the array.