Free Radical Sterilization System for Heat-Sensitive Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current sterilization methods are inadequate for effectively sterilizing heat-sensitive devices at atmospheric pressure, as they often require high temperatures and may not efficiently generate bactericidal free radicals, especially in closed loop systems.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses a combination of plasma electric discharge and hydrogen peroxide vaporization to generate bactericidal free radicals, which are recirculated in a closed loop system for sterilization, along with a blower and filter to manage airflow and neutralize radicals, and can be used in both rotating and stationary chambers, including a wound chamber for healing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If high temperature sterilization is used, then sterilization effectiveness is improved, but heat-sensitive devices are damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesterilization effectivenessVSAvoidsterilization temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the sterilization mechanism from thermal to chemical by using free radicals generated through plasma electric discharge or hydrogen peroxide vaporization. This parameter change allows sterilization to occur at atmospheric pressure and low temperatures, effectively resolving the contradiction between sterilization effectiveness and heat sensitivity of devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the mechanical/thermal sterilization system with a chemical field-based system using free radicals. The plasma electric discharge generator or hydrogen peroxide vaporizer creates a chemical environment that sterilizes without requiring high temperatures, thus protecting heat-sensitive devices while maintaining sterilization effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If open loop VHP system is used, then system complexity is reduced, but sterilization efficiency decreases due to vapor exhaustion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidsterilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention implements a closed loop system where the carrier gas is recirculated through the sterilization chamber and back to the vaporizer. This feedback mechanism allows the system to reuse the carrier gas and maintain consistent VHP concentration, improving sterilization efficiency while managing system complexity through automated recirculation and control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The closed loop recirculation system ensures continuous exposure of items to VHP by repeatedly cycling the carrier gas through the sterilization chamber. This continuous action maintains high VHP concentration levels and ensures thorough sterilization, addressing the efficiency limitation of single-pass open loop systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Quantity of substance

If closed loop recirculation is used, then free radical concentration is increased, but system complexity increases due to additional components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefree radical concentrationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The carrier gas serves multiple functions: it transports VHP from the vaporizer to the sterilization chamber, facilitates recirculation to maintain free radical concentration, and acts as a medium for heat transfer. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate systems and minimizes overall complexity while achieving high free radical concentration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The carrier gas acts as an intermediary that enables the closed loop recirculation system to function. It mediates between the VHP generation, distribution, and recirculation processes, allowing the system to maintain high free radical concentration without requiring direct contact between all components, thus managing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If catalytic destroyer is used to eliminate VHP, then safety is improved, but loss of substance increases due to VHP destruction

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveVHP residual safetyVSAvoidVHP loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses partial destruction of VHP through the catalytic destroyer rather than complete elimination. By positioning the destroyer at specific locations and controlling its operation, the system achieves sufficient safety by removing excess VHP while allowing some to remain for continued sterilization effectiveness, thus balancing safety requirements with substance conservation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUSRE49474E1Free radical sterilization system and method
Publication Date: 2023.03.28 STERIFRE MEDICAL INC
  • USRE49474E1 patent drawing
  • USRE49474E1 patent drawing
  • USRE49474E1 patent drawing

AI summary

A free radical sterilization system having a chamber defining a region, and a generator for generating free radical reach effluent from a free radical electric generator and/or a vaporizer. A closed loop circulating system without a free-radical destroyer is provided for supplying the mixture of free radicals from the electric generator mixed with the hydrogen peroxide solution in the form of the effluent to the chamber. The free-radical sterilization system is used in sterilizing items in the chamber and, with an open-bottomed wound chamber, in treating wounds on a body.