Freeboard Tar Destruction Unit for Biomass Gasifier

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current biomass gasification methods face challenges in efficiently reducing tar content in the produced gas, with existing thermal and catalytic treatments being costly and prone to catalytic degradation, and requiring additional vessels or high temperatures.

Innovation Solution

A free-board tar destruction unit is integrated into the gasifier, featuring a catalyst and heating means within the free-board section, which reduces tar levels without the need for a secondary reaction vessel, thereby minimizing capital and operating costs and catalytic degradation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If secondary catalytic treatment is implemented in a separate vessel, then tar removal efficiency is improved, but device complexity and capital cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetar removal efficiencyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the catalytic treatment function with the existing gasifier structure by installing the catalyst bed in the free-board section of the gasifier. This merging eliminates the need for a separate secondary treatment vessel while maintaining tar removal efficiency, directly resolving the contradiction between reliability and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The gasifier structure is designed to serve multiple functions: primary gasification, secondary catalytic tar removal, and thermal treatment. By making the gasifier multi-functional, the patent avoids adding separate equipment while achieving comprehensive tar removal, addressing both reliability improvement and complexity reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If high temperature thermal treatment is applied, then tar content is reduced, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetar content reductionVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the approach from high-temperature thermal treatment to catalytic treatment at moderate temperatures. By altering the treatment parameter from temperature to catalyst presence, the system achieves tar removal with lower energy input, resolving the contradiction between tar content reduction and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the thermal treatment mechanism (high temperature heating) with a catalytic mechanism. This substitution allows tar removal to occur at lower temperatures through chemical catalysis, significantly reducing the energy required while maintaining effective tar content reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If catalyst is placed in the gasifier bed, then tar conversion is enhanced, but catalyst degradation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetar conversionVSAvoidcatalyst lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by placing the catalyst bed specifically in the free-board section rather than throughout the entire gasifier bed. This localized placement ensures the catalyst is exposed to tar-rich gases without direct contact with the harsh conditions (high temperature, char particles) in the main reaction zone, thereby enhancing tar conversion while protecting the catalyst from degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If secondary thermal treatment vessel is added, then tar removal is improved, but operating cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetar removalVSAvoidoperating cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the secondary thermal treatment function into the existing gasifier operation. By integrating the catalytic treatment within the gasifier's free-board section, the system eliminates the need for a separate secondary vessel and its associated heating energy, thereby reducing operating costs while maintaining improved tar removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration achieves low tar levels, combining the benefits of secondary catalytic and thermal treatments while reducing costs and maintaining catalyst effectiveness, without the need for a secondary vessel, thus enhancing the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of tar reduction.

Implementation Method 1

a catalyst for promoting thermal cracking and/or reforming reactions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

thermal cracking and/or reforming reactions which convert the tar into lighter compounds and hydrogen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal cracking: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 3

heating means for heating the gas and the catalyst

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS9364812B2Freeboard tar destruction unit
Publication Date: 2016.06.14 HIGHBURY BIOFUEL TECH
  • US9364812B2 patent drawing
  • US9364812B2 patent drawing
  • US9364812B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A tar destruction unit for a biomass gasifier is described, comprising a catalyst and/or heating means situated within the free-board section of the gasifier. Also described is a biomass gasifier having such a tar destruction unit.