Freefall Loss Prevention Modules for Falling Object Deceleration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current safety solutions fail to effectively prevent loss and injury from objects in freefall, as they either require human intervention or are not designed to manage motion during freefall, leading to potential harm and damage.

Innovation Solution

A loss prevention device integrated into objects that detects freefall and deploys modules such as drag forces, trajectory diversion, or shock absorption mechanisms to manipulate the object's motion and prevent loss without human input, utilizing sensors, microcontrollers, and release mechanisms to activate loss prevention modules.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If safety nets are used to prevent falling objects from causing injury, then objects are prevented from reaching the ground, but the safety nets are immobile and cannot protect individuals not positioned below the net

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinjury from falling objectsVSAvoidprotection coverage area
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the static safety net into a dynamic system by deploying inflatable cushions along the trajectory path. These cushions are positioned at multiple locations to create a moving protection zone that can cover larger areas and protect individuals positioned at different locations, not just directly below the fall point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extends protection from a single vertical plane (below the object) to a three-dimensional space by placing inflatable cushions at multiple heights and positions along the expected trajectory. This creates a volumetric protection zone that can intercept objects at various points in their fall path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If behavioral guidelines such as the grab-and-twist method are used, then human intervention can prevent loss, but these methods can fail due to lack of training or human error during split-second windows

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloss prevention reliabilityVSAvoidautomatic intervention capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates sensors that automatically detect freefall conditions and trigger the deployment of loss prevention modules without requiring human input. The device monitors its own state and autonomously activates protection mechanisms when freefall is detected, eliminating dependence on human reaction time or training.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses sensors to continuously monitor the object's motion state and provides feedback to the control mechanism. When freefall conditions are detected through sensor data, the system automatically activates the loss prevention modules, creating a closed-loop control system that responds reliably to actual conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If tethering tools or attachment points are used to prevent objects from dropping, then objects are secured during normal operation, but these solutions provide no remedy when the object is already in freefall

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject securityVSAvoidresponse to freefall state
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The loss prevention modules are pre-positioned and ready for deployment before freefall occurs. When freefall is detected, the system rapidly deploys these pre-positioned modules to intercept the object, providing immediate protection rather than attempting to secure an already-falling object.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a static tethering approach to a dynamic response system that activates loss prevention modules during freefall. The modules can deploy at various points along the trajectory based on real-time conditions, adapting to the object's motion state rather than relying on fixed attachment points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device effectively decelerates, redirects, or absorbs falling objects, reducing the risk of injury and damage by autonomously managing their motion during freefall, enhancing safety in hazardous environments.

Implementation Method 1

The sensor(s) 104 may include, but are not limited to, one or more of the group consisting of: an accelerometer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAccelerometer: Accelerometer

Implementation Method 2

the loss prevention module(s) 107 may be configured to create drag on the object so as to decelerate the object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDrag: Drag

Implementation Method 3

the loss prevention module(s) 107 may be configured to absorb shock

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock absorption: Damping

Data Source

PatentUS11231689B2Loss prevention device triggered by freefall
Publication Date: 2022.01.25 MAGEE SAM HUNTER
  • US11231689B2 patent drawing
  • US11231689B2 patent drawing
  • US11231689B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosure are various embodiments of a loss prevention device responsive to freefall. The loss prevention device can be integrated into any object and incorporates physical, mechanical, and/or electrical modules configured to prevent the likelihood that dropping the object causes injury to persons or damage to structures in the vicinity. Such modules may constitute continuous or discrete, static or dynamic portions of the housing of the loss prevention device. Other modules may incorporate electromechanical components that allow for effective manipulation of the motion of the loss prevention device and the coupled object. The device can be configured to deploy said modules upon detecting freefall. In some cases, the device incorporate a release mechanism that facilitates said deployment.