Freeway Queue Warning System Using Crash Probability Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Sudden changes in traffic conditions often lead to rear-end crashes, as drivers are unable to anticipate crash-prone areas on the road, resulting in frequent and potentially severe collisions.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing sensors to collect data on traffic conditions, calculate crash probabilities, and provide alerts to vehicle controllers through a processor, enabling timely warnings to drivers or vehicle systems about impending crash-prone conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If drivers rely on their own observation and reaction to traffic conditions, then they maintain full control of their vehicles, but they cannot anticipate crash-prone conditions in time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrash prevention capabilityVSAvoidreaction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of crash-prone conditions by analyzing traffic flow data, vehicle spacing, and environmental factors before actual crashes occur. The processor calculates crash probabilities in advance and sends warnings to drivers, allowing them to take preventive action before entering dangerous situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A centralized server acts as an intermediary between traffic sensors and vehicle controllers. The server collects data from multiple sources, processes it to determine crash probabilities, and relays warnings to drivers, bridging the gap between raw traffic conditions and driver awareness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a crash warning system is implemented using sensors and processors, then crash-prone conditions can be detected and warnings provided, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrash detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The server performs multiple functions including data collection from various sensors, crash probability calculation using multiple parameters, warning message generation, and communication with different vehicle controllers. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated components for each task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses existing infrastructure components (traffic sensors, vehicle controllers, communication networks) that are already present in modern transportation systems. Rather than requiring entirely new specialized equipment, the invention leverages and integrates existing technologies to provide crash warning capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10783787B2Freeway queue warning system
Publication Date: 2020.09.22 PAULSON MANUFACTURING CORP
  • US10783787B2 patent drawing
  • US10783787B2 patent drawing
  • US10783787B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes using sensors to collect information about vehicles on a road and determining a plurality of crash probabilities based on the collected information. Each crash probability indicates a probability of a vehicular crash on the road at a respective point in time. The plurality of crash probabilities is averaged to form an average crash probability and the average crash probability is used to determine when to provide a message to a controller of a vehicle.