Freeze Drying Tray Temperature and Chamber Pressure Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Freeze drying processes often face challenges in efficiently controlling the sublimation rate and pressure dynamics, leading to incomplete drying and potential damage to sensitive substances due to inadequate temperature and pressure management.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that alternate between constant-pressure and constant-temperature drying phases in a vacuum chamber, using a heating tray and sensors to control the freeze drying process, ensuring that the temperature of the tray reaches a maximum temperature to halt the phases and maintain optimal sublimation rates, thereby controlling the pressure and preventing overheating.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the temperature of the heating tray is continuously increased to accelerate sublimation, then the drying speed improves, but the risk of overheating and damaging sensitive substances increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrying speedVSAvoidoverheating damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic alternation between constant-pressure drying phases and constant-temperature drying phases. During constant-pressure phases, the heating tray temperature increases to accelerate sublimation. During constant-temperature phases, the temperature is held constant to prevent overheating while pressure decreases to maintain sublimation conditions. This periodic cycling resolves the contradiction by providing acceleration periods followed by protection periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Productivity

If the pressure in the chamber is continuously decreased to enhance sublimation, then the drying efficiency improves, but the control over sublimation rate becomes difficult to manage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrying efficiencyVSAvoidsublimation rate control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent alternates between constant-pressure phases where pressure is maintained while temperature increases, and constant-temperature phases where temperature is held constant while pressure decreases. This periodic approach allows the system to achieve low pressure for efficient sublimation while maintaining control during the constant-temperature phases where the sublimation rate can be stabilized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically changes operating parameters by alternating between holding pressure constant while varying temperature, and holding temperature constant while varying pressure. This parameter switching strategy enables the system to optimize drying efficiency at different stages while maintaining controllable sublimation rates through the alternating phase structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If alternating drying phases are extended to achieve complete dehydration, then the drying thoroughness improves, but the process time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedehydration completenessVSAvoidprocess time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs alternating constant-pressure and constant-temperature drying phases that continue until the heating tray temperature reaches a maximum threshold. This periodic structure enables complete dehydration through multiple cycling phases while establishing a clear termination condition (maximum temperature reached) that prevents excessive processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses temperature sensing to monitor the heating tray temperature and provides feedback to the control system. When the maximum temperature is reached, the system halts the alternating phases. This feedback mechanism ensures complete dehydration is achieved while automatically terminating the process at the optimal point, preventing unnecessary time extension.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for more precise control over the freeze drying process, ensuring complete dehydration with reduced risk of substance damage, while maintaining a stable pressure environment, thus enhancing the preservation and stabilization of the dried substances.

Implementation Method 1

a temperature of the heating tray increases

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

a pressure in the chamber decreases

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Implementation Method 3

water is removed from a substance by sublimation... sublimation removes solid ice and converts the ice directly to a gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSublimation: Sublimation

Data Source

PatentUS11287185B1Freeze drying with constant-pressure and constant-temperature phases
Publication Date: 2022.03.29 STAY FRESH TECH LLC
  • US11287185B1 patent drawing
  • US11287185B1 patent drawing
  • US11287185B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Freeze-drying methods and systems include performing a constant-pressure drying phase in a chamber, where a temperature of a heating tray increases. A constant-temperature drying phase is performed in the chamber, where a pressure in the chamber decreases. Additional phases alternate between constant-pressure drying phases and constant-temperature drying phases. The alternating drying phases are halted, responsive to a determination that the temperature of the heating tray has reached a maximum temperature.