Frequency-Dependent Ray Tracing at Sub-Surface Interfaces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional ray tracing methods break down at interfaces with high contrast or complex structures, such as those with salt and rugose boundaries, and finite-difference methods are computationally demanding, necessitating more effective data processing techniques for sub-surface region imaging.

Innovation Solution

The method involves performing conventional ray tracing before and after the interface, and at the interface, computing a frequency-dependent outgoing ray direction based on the incoming ray direction, surface normals, and a computed boundary integral that incorporates a frequency parameter, allowing for improved wave propagation modeling through the use of boundary integrals and Fresnel volumes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional ray tracing is used, then computational efficiency is improved, but accuracy breaks down at interfaces with high contrast or complex structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidwave propagation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different ray tracing approaches in different spatial locations: conventional ray tracing is used in regions away from interfaces where it is efficient, while frequency-dependent ray tracing with boundary integrals is applied specifically at interfaces with high contrast or complex structures where accuracy is compromised. This localized application of different methods optimizes both computational efficiency and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If finite-difference methods are used, then wave propagation accuracy is improved, but computational demand increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewave propagation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the computational domain into regions where different methods are applied: finite-difference accuracy is captured through frequency-dependent boundary integrals only at interfaces, while conventional ray tracing handles the bulk regions. This segmentation avoids the prohibitive computational cost of applying finite-difference methods throughout the entire domain while preserving their accuracy benefits where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces frequency-dependent boundary integrals as an intermediary approach that bridges conventional ray tracing and full finite-difference methods. These boundary integrals capture the band-limited wave propagation effects of finite-difference methods at interfaces without requiring the full computational apparatus of finite-difference schemes, thus providing finite-difference accuracy at ray-tracing computational cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Stability of the object's composition

If model smoothing is applied, then geometric ray stability is improved, but interface complexity and contrast are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveray tracing stabilityVSAvoidinterface structure fidelity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses frequency-dependent boundary integrals that incorporate the actual interface geometry and velocity contrasts without modification. These integrals compute the wavefield effects by integrating over the true interface structure, thus preserving interface complexity and contrast fidelity while providing stable results without requiring model smoothing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Measurement precision

If frequency-dependent ray tracing with boundary integrals is used, then accuracy at interfaces is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface wave propagation accuracyVSAvoidmethod complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements frequency-dependent boundary integrals that capture the essential band-limited wave propagation effects at interfaces without computing the full spectrum of possible wave interactions. By focusing on the dominant frequency-dependent effects rather than all possible wave phenomena, the method achieves sufficient accuracy for seismic imaging while keeping computational complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP2678715B1Frequency-dependent ray tracing through an interface
Publication Date: 2021.04.21 GECO TECH BV
  • EP2678715B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2678715B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP2678715B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

Computing systems and methods for improving processing of collected data are disclosed. In one embodiment, while ray-tracing through a sub-surface region, a frequency-dependent outgoing ray direction is computed from a point on an interface disposed in the sub-surface region when the ray tracing is at the interface.