Frequency Domain Interference Cancellation Using Segmented Transform

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current full duplex Ethernet communication systems face significant circuit complexity and power consumption due to the need for different filter lengths to simulate echo and near-end cross talk (NEXT) interference, leading to inefficient computation and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves performing interference cancellation and channel equalization in the frequency domain, using a time-domain processing module to shape the transmitted signal and divide it into groups, allowing for a smaller bit number representation and shared transforming circuitry, which reduces computation complexity and cost.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If different filter lengths are used to simulate echo and NEXT interference, then the interference cancellation accuracy is improved, but the circuit complexity and power consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference cancellation accuracyVSAvoidcircuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The received data is divided into several groups, and the transforming computation is performed on each group separately. This segmentation reduces the size of the transforming computation from handling all data at once to handling smaller subsets, thereby reducing circuit complexity while maintaining interference cancellation accuracy through grouped processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A shared transforming circuit is designed to handle multiple interference types (both echo and NEXT) by processing divided data groups. This universal circuit eliminates the need for separate dedicated circuits for each interference type, reducing overall circuit complexity while maintaining the ability to cancel different interference signals accurately

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If different filter lengths are used to simulate echo and NEXT interference, then the interference cancellation accuracy is improved, but the power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference cancellation accuracyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the received data into groups and performing transforming computation on each group separately, the computational load per time step is reduced. This leads to lower power consumption while maintaining accurate interference cancellation through systematic grouped processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a caching mechanism where previously computed transforming results are stored and reused when appropriate. This discards redundant computations and recovers useful results from previous processing, reducing overall power consumption while maintaining cancellation accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Measurement precision

If a large number of taps are used in the filter, then the interference simulation accuracy is improved, but the length problem of the interference cancellation module increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference simulation accuracyVSAvoidlength of interference cancellation module
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The data is divided into groups for transforming computation, which effectively manages the length of the interference cancellation module by processing smaller subsets. This maintains simulation accuracy through systematic grouping while controlling module length through divided processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Measurement precision

If separate transforming circuits are used for different interference types, then the interference cancellation accuracy is improved, but the cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference cancellation accuracyVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

A shared transforming circuit is designed to handle multiple interference types by processing divided data groups. This universal approach maintains cancellation accuracy through proper grouping and processing while significantly reducing cost by eliminating the need for multiple separate transforming circuits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS7933196B2Method and apparatus for canceling channel interference
Publication Date: 2011.04.26 REALTEK SEMICON CORP
  • US7933196B2 patent drawing
  • US7933196B2 patent drawing
  • US7933196B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus for channel interference cancellation includes a first interference-cancellation module and a first cancellation-signal generating circuit. The first interference-cancellation module comprises a first processing circuit including a grouping circuit and a first transforming circuit. The grouping circuit divides received data into a plurality of groups of first sub-data. The first transforming circuit sequentially transforms the groups of first sub-data from a first domain to a second domain to generate a plurality of groups of first transformed sub-data. The first cancellation-signal generating circuit comprises a delay unit, a first processing unit and a second processing unit. The delay unit sequentially delays the groups of first transformed sub-data to generate a plurality of groups of delayed sub-data. The first and the second processing unit output a first and a second processed signal according to the groups of first transformed sub-data and the groups of delayed sub-data respectively.