Frequency Response Function Analysis for Damped Natural Frequency Identification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining damped natural frequencies of dynamic systems, especially with limited measurement locations, are inefficient and prone to misidentification due to noise and non-linear effects, which is critical for automating control loop tuning in motion control systems.

Innovation Solution

A method that smooths the frequency response function, identifies candidate frequencies by analyzing the derivative's sign changes, and applies stricter criteria to eliminate less significant candidates, using a combination of amplitude and phase analysis to differentiate between poles and zeros, while reducing noise effects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing least squares methods are used to fit FRF measurements, then a complete model can be obtained, but the method fails when the number of measurement locations is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency identification accuracyVSAvoidnumber of measurement locations
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the frequency identification process into two distinct phases: first identifying candidate frequencies using derivative sign changes (amplitude extrema), then filtering these candidates using phase analysis and optimization. This segmentation allows accurate frequency identification even with limited measurements by separating the frequency detection task from the parameter estimation task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary identification of candidate frequencies by detecting where the derivative of the amplitude function changes sign, before applying the full least squares optimization. This preliminary action narrows down the search space to only relevant frequency candidates, making the subsequent optimization more robust and effective even with limited measurement data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Extent of automation

If heuristic methods like Moser's approach are used for servo tuning, then the process can be automated, but the method occasionally fails to identify poles or zeros that affect controller tuning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauto-tuning capabilityVSAvoidpole/zero identification reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates feedback through an iterative optimization process that minimizes the least squared error between the original FRF and the synthesized FRF from identified poles and zeros. This feedback mechanism continuously refines the identification, ensuring that all significant poles and zeros affecting controller tuning are captured, thereby improving reliability while maintaining automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamic, adaptive criteria for accepting or rejecting frequency candidates based on phase analysis and optimization results. Rather than using fixed heuristic rules, the method dynamically adjusts its acceptance criteria based on the actual FRF characteristics, ensuring reliable identification of all poles and zeros that impact controller performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If standard FRF analysis methods are used, then frequency identification can be performed, but noise and non-linear effects cause false pole identification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency identification speedVSAvoidnoise immunity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces phase analysis as an intermediary verification step between frequency candidate identification and final acceptance. By using phase change direction as a mediator to validate amplitude-based candidates, the method effectively filters out false positives caused by noise and non-linear effects while maintaining rapid identification throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the analysis parameter from purely amplitude-based to a combined amplitude-phase approach. By monitoring both the magnitude and phase characteristics of FRF at candidate frequencies, the method distinguishes true system poles from noise-induced artifacts, significantly improving noise immunity without sacrificing identification speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS7684759B2Method for determining the damped natural frequencies of a dynamic system
Publication Date: 2010.03.23 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC
  • US7684759B2 patent drawing
  • US7684759B2 patent drawing
  • US7684759B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention is a novel device, system, and method for determining the damped natural frequencies of a dynamic system whose characteristics are available in the form of a “frequency response function” FRF. According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the method identifies the dampened natural frequencies associated with the poles and zeros of a transfer function. The method is especially useful for analysis of measurements that contain some degree of contamination due to noise or non-linear effects. It is based on a set of rules that may be more successful than a direct approach based on a least squares criteria.