Friction Wedge Casting via Segmented Mold and Core

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Friction wedge dampers produced via green sand casting face issues with draft angles leading to inconsistent dimensions, requiring additional finishing steps, and resulting in increased time and potential scrapping due to the difficulty in achieving flat and smooth surfaces on critical portions.

Innovation Solution

The method involves forming cavities in a mold with cores that define the column face of the friction wedge, using rigging with a down sprue, ingate, and runner to direct molten material, and applying heat treatment to achieve a surface finish of less than 500 micro-inches RMS and a hardness of 420-520 BHN, with a microstructure comprising Bainite, Martensite, Austenite, and Carbide, and no more than 5% Pearlite.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If draft angles are added to the mold pattern to enable pattern extraction, then the mold can be opened and the pattern removed, but the casting develops inconsistent dimensions and requires additional finishing steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern extractionVSAvoiddimensional consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The mold is divided into two separate halves (cope and drag) that can be independently removed. This segmentation allows the pattern to be extracted without requiring draft angles on the final casting surfaces, as each mold half can be separated along the parting line while maintaining dimensional accuracy of critical surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The solution moves the extraction problem to a different dimension by introducing a parting line between cope and drag halves. Instead of extracting the pattern vertically from a single mold piece (requiring draft angles), the mold itself is split horizontally, allowing pattern removal without compromising the dimensional consistency of vertical or horizontal surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Manufacturing precision

If additional finishing steps are applied to achieve flat and smooth surfaces on critical portions, then surface quality improves, but manufacturing time increases and scrapping risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface flatness and smoothnessVSAvoidmanufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The mold cavity surfaces are prepared in advance with precise finishes and geometries that directly form the critical surfaces of the casting. By pre-configuring the mold cavities with the required surface quality and dimensional accuracy, the need for post-casting finishing operations is eliminated, thereby maintaining high surface quality while improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If additional finishing steps are applied to achieve flat and smooth surfaces on critical portions, then surface quality improves, but the risk of scrapping increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface flatness and smoothnessVSAvoidscrap rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The mold cavities are pre-configured with precise surface finishes and geometries that directly form the critical surfaces of the casting. By pre-configuring the mold cavities with the required surface quality and dimensional accuracy, the need for post-casting finishing operations is eliminated, thereby maintaining high surface quality while improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in friction wedges with substantially flat surfaces, reduced need for grinding, improved dimensional consistency, increased service life, and optimized wear distribution, enabling faster break-in and longer part life.

Implementation Method 1

Molten material is poured into the mold to form the friction wedge casting

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity flow: Gravitation

Implementation Method 2

applying heat treatment to achieve a surface finish of less than 500 micro-inches RMS and a hardness of 420-520 BHN, with a microstructure comprising Bainite, Martensite, Austenite, and Carbide

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat treatment: Heat Treatment

Data Source

PatentUS9457395B2Split wedge and method for making same
Publication Date: 2016.10.04 NEVIS IND LLC
  • US9457395B2 patent drawing
  • US9457395B2 patent drawing
  • US9457395B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of manufacturing a friction wedge of a rail car includes forming, in drag and cope portions of a mold, at least one cavity that defines at least some exterior features of at least one friction wedge. At least one core is inserted into the drag portion adjacent to the cavity. The core includes at least one surface configured to define a column face of the friction wedge. Rigging is formed in the drag and cope portion of the mold. The rigging includes a down sprue, at least one ingate, and at least one runner for directing molten material to the cavity. Molten material is poured into the mold to form the friction wedge casting. The friction wedge casting is removed from the mold. Rigging is removed from the friction wedge casting and the friction wedge casting is finished.