Friction-Wheel Buffer Forming for Low-Deformation Honeycomb Cores

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional honeycomb paper buffers face issues with high manufacturing costs, uneven surfaces, and reduced buffering effectiveness due to compression and bending during shaping, leading to increased shipping costs and inefficiencies in production.

Innovation Solution

A buffer forming machine that continuously presses and conveys a honeycomb core through a feed, shaping, and rebound stages using friction wheels to maintain minimal deformation and ensure a smooth, fast production process, forming hexagonal honeycomb bodies with controlled expansion and rebounding to maintain structural integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Shape

If conventional honeycomb paper buffers are compressed and bent during shaping to form folds, then the buffer structure is formed, but the buffering effectiveness is reduced and surface unevenness occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebuffer structure formationVSAvoidbuffering effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides the buffer into a honeycomb core portion and separate folded portions (wings). The honeycomb core maintains its original cushioning structure without compression or bending, while the folded portions are separately formed and attached to provide the necessary structural shape and folding functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts the folding function from the honeycomb core structure itself and relocates it to separate folded portions (wings) that are attached to the core. This allows the core to retain its optimal cushioning geometry while the wings provide the necessary folds and structural form.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Volume of moving object

If honeycomb paper buffers are made with expanded structure to increase buffering volume, then the buffering capacity is improved, but the manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebuffering volumeVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention pre-forms the honeycomb core to the desired expanded volume and shape before attachment of the folded portions. This preliminary formation of the core structure eliminates the need for costly post-expansion processes and ensures consistent buffering volume without increasing manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Stability of the object's composition

If folded portions are secured to honeycomb core by bonding to maintain structure, then the structural integrity is improved, but the shipping cost increases due to expansion space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidshipping cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses thin folded portions (wings) that can be flat-packed against the honeycomb core during shipping. These flexible folded portions provide structural integrity when attached but occupy minimal space during transport, significantly reducing shipping costs compared to fully expanded buffer structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

4Reliability

If honeycomb paper buffers are continuously formed without compression to maintain buffering effectiveness, then the buffering effectiveness is maintained, but the shaping difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebuffering effectivenessVSAvoidshaping difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the buffer formation process into two independent stages: (1) forming the honeycomb core without compression to maintain buffering effectiveness, and (2) separately forming and attaching the folded portions to provide structural shape. This segmentation eliminates the conflict between maintaining core integrity and achieving desired buffer shape.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The machine effectively forms buffers with maintained buffering effectiveness and reduced deformation, ensuring a stable and efficient manufacturing process while minimizing material compression and surface unevenness.

Implementation Method 1

A buffer forming machine that continuously presses and conveys a honeycomb core through a feed, shaping, and rebound stages using friction wheels

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

forming hexagonal honeycomb bodies with controlled expansion and rebounding to maintain structural integrity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic Recovery: Elastic Recovery

Data Source

PatentUS20250332806A1Buffer forming machine
Publication Date: 2025.10.30 CHANG JUI CHUN
  • US20250332806A1 patent drawing
  • US20250332806A1 patent drawing
  • US20250332806A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A buffer forming machine includes a frame and a roller unit. The roller unit includes at least two friction wheel sets spaced apart from each other, one of the at least two friction wheel sets defining a feed region, another one of the at least two friction wheel sets defining an output region. A ratio of a height of the output region in the height direction to a height of the feed region in the height direction is greater than 70%. The height of the feed region in the height direction is configured to be 90-95% of a height of each of the plurality of sheet materials in the height direction. The height of the output region in the height direction is configured to be 70-75% of the height of each of the plurality of the sheet materials.