Frictional Coupling With Complementary Rough Surfaces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mechanical couplings face issues with security under shock or vibrational forces, often requiring additional components and limiting orientation flexibility, with insufficient retaining force and susceptibility to loosening.

Innovation Solution

A frictional coupling method involving surfaces with complementary shapes and surface roughness averaging less than 500 microinches, utilizing projections in a preselected pattern to create a friction fit that resists movement, with an elastic compressive range matching the surface roughness, ensuring secure engagement without additional components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a ball-and-dimple mechanical coupling is used, then the parts are retained securely, but it requires additional components (ball, spring, bore, dimple) and limits orientation flexibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretaining securityVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the ball, spring, bore, and dimple components from the coupling mechanism, replacing them with a direct friction-based interface between complementary surfaces. This extraction of unnecessary components simplifies the device while maintaining retaining security through friction forces generated by the interference fit between the first and second surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The complementary surfaces design allows the coupling to function in multiple orientations without requiring additional components or adjustments. The friction-based mechanism provides universal retention capability across different orientations, eliminating the orientation limitations of ball-and-dimple couplings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If a set screw coupling is used, then the first part is retained within the second part, but shock and vibration may gradually work the set screw loose

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretaining securityVSAvoidresistance to loosening
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the set screw mechanical fastening system with a friction-based retention system. Instead of relying on a threaded screw that can gradually loosen under vibration, the invention uses friction forces generated by the interference fit between complementary surfaces, which do not suffer from gradual loosening and provide stable retention under shock and vibration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If an interference-fit coupling is used, then the parts engage securely, but vibrational forces may cause directional elastic deformation and the tool may walk out of the recess

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengagement securityVSAvoidsusceptibility to vibration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating specific surface characteristics on the complementary surfaces, including controlled roughness and geometric features. These localized surface properties enhance friction forces at the interface, preventing the tool from walking out under vibrational forces while maintaining secure engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention employs composite surface structures combining smooth and rough regions, or different material properties at the interface, to optimize friction characteristics. This composite approach enhances resistance to vibrational forces while maintaining secure engagement between the tool and holder.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Force

If traditional mechanical couplings are used, then retaining force is provided, but the amount of retaining force may be insufficient under shock and vibration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretaining forceVSAvoidsecurity under shock
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameters of the coupling interface by optimizing surface roughness, contact area, and friction coefficients of the complementary surfaces. These parameter changes increase the friction-based retaining force, providing sufficient security under shock and vibration without requiring additional mechanical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a secure mechanical coupling that remains stable under shock and vibration, offering orientation flexibility and enhanced retaining force without additional components, effectively preventing unintended disassembly.

Implementation Method 1

The projections have an average elastic compressive range substantially equal to the surface roughness average of the first surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

projections... are configured to produce a friction fit between the first surface and the second surface when the first and the second surfaces are biased against each other

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS10208775B2Methods of frictional coupling
Publication Date: 2019.02.19 THE BOEING CO
  • US10208775B2 patent drawing
  • US10208775B2 patent drawing
  • US10208775B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of forming a coupling between a first part and a second part is disclosed. The method includes providing a first surface of the first part. The first surface has a first shape and a surface roughness average that is less than or equal to about 500 microinches (13 microns). The method also includes forming a second surface of the second part where the second surface has a second shape and the first shape and the second shape are substantially complementary shapes. Projections form at least a portion of the second surface in a preselected pattern, and are configured to produce a friction fit between the first surface and the second surface when the first surface and the second surface are biased against each other. The projections have an average elastic compressive range substantially equal to the surface roughness average.