Frictionless Hip Joint Prosthesis Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current hip replacement prosthetics face issues such as hip dislocations, the need for revision surgery, metallic wear particle contamination, limited weight-bearing capacity, and corrosion due to dissimilar metals, which are not adequately addressed by existing technologies.

Innovation Solution

The design of an orthopedic hip prosthesis that eliminates the traditional ceramic liner, internalizes major motion within the prosthesis, uses a sacrificial anode for corrosion resistance, and employs a lubricant like honey to reduce wear and friction, allowing for a larger femoral head and more durable materials without corrosion concerns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a larger ball head is used, then hip dislocation is reduced, but friction wear on the liner increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehip dislocation resistanceVSAvoidfriction wear
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the ceramic liner entirely from the hip prosthesis design, extracting the component that suffers from friction wear. This eliminates the harmful wear effect while preserving the benefit of using a larger ball head for dislocation resistance, as the ball head now articulates directly with the acetabulum without a liner interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Device complexity

If the ceramic liner is removed, then revision surgery is eliminated, but wear particles may contaminate body tissue

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveliner replacement needVSAvoidmetallic wear particle contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a homogenous material construction where the ball head and acetabulum are both made from the same corrosion-resistant metal alloy. This eliminates the issue of dissimilar metal wear particles contaminating body tissue, as any wear particles generated would be from the same biocompatible material rather than from dissimilar ceramic or polymer liners.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

3Reliability

If dissimilar metals are used, then corrosion resistance is compromised, but material selection is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrosion resistanceVSAvoidmaterial selection flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs homogenous material construction using the same corrosion-resistant metal alloy for both the ball head and acetabulum components. This eliminates galvanic corrosion between dissimilar metals while providing sufficient material selection flexibility to choose from various biocompatible metal alloys with appropriate mechanical properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes metal alloy composite materials that combine corrosion resistance with appropriate mechanical strength and biocompatibility. These composite metal materials provide both the corrosion resistance needed for long-term implant reliability and the mechanical properties required for load-bearing hip joint functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Ease of operation

If a larger ball head is used, then range of motion is increased, but friction damage to components increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverange of motionVSAvoidsurface finish damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

By removing the ceramic liner that is susceptible to friction damage, the patent allows the use of a larger ball head that increases range of motion without compromising component durability. The larger ball head articulates directly with the acetabulum in a way that maximizes motion while minimizing wear through proper material selection and surface engineering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design significantly reduces hip dislocations, extends the implant's lifespan, contains wear particles within the prosthesis, and prevents corrosion, enabling greater weight-bearing capacity and reduced maintenance needs.

Implementation Method 1

employ a lubricant like honey to reduce wear and friction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLubrication: Lubrication

Implementation Method 2

uses a sacrificial anode for corrosion resistance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGalvanic corrosion protection: Galvanometer

Implementation Method 3

The desired lubricant may comprise tallow, a processed animal or human fat that melts from solid to viscous between 85° f and 104° f, which is conveniently the temperature range of humans

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Data Source

PatentUS11331192B2Frictionless hip joint
Publication Date: 2022.05.17 NOEL RARES ORTHO DEVICES INC
  • US11331192B2 patent drawing
  • US11331192B2 patent drawing
  • US11331192B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An orthopedic prosthesis includes a head which internally accommodates the major motion of a patient, e.g., during walking, thereby reducing wear against a cup or liner. A neck may be utilized which rotates within the distal member about an axis aligned with the major motion of the patient. The orthopedic prosthesis may also include a sacrificial anode, a seal made of natural fibers, and utilize lubricant made of honey.