Front-End Metal Structures for IC Thermal Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

As transistor sizes continue to shrink, conventional thermal mitigation approaches in integrated circuit (IC) devices become inadequate in effectively managing heat, leading to the formation of hot spots and inefficient heat dissipation.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of front-end metal structures within the semiconductor material of the substrate, which extend from the active electronic devices into the substrate, providing improved paths for heat transfer and dissipation closer to the heat sources, thereby enhancing thermal management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If conventional thermal mitigation approaches are used, then heat dissipation is provided, but the approaches become inadequate as transistor sizes shrink, leading to hot spot formation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat dissipation effectivenessVSAvoidadaptability to scaled transistor sizes
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces vertical metal structures (via structures, trenches, pillars) that extend into the substrate depth, adding a vertical dimension to heat dissipation pathways. This three-dimensional thermal management approach complements conventional planar heat spreading, enabling heat to be conducted away from scaled transistors in multiple directions and depths, thereby maintaining effectiveness as transistor sizes shrink.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The thermal mitigation is divided into multiple discrete metal structures distributed throughout the substrate, including via structures at transistor locations, trenches between transistor rows, and pillars at strategic positions. This segmented approach allows localized heat management at hot spots while maintaining overall thermal balance, adapting to the scaled and densely packed transistor architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If front-end metal structures are placed closer to active electronic devices, then heat dissipation is accelerated, but the complexity of integrating these structures increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat dissipation rateVSAvoidintegration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple functions into the same metal structures: the via structures serve both as electrical interconnects between transistor layers and as thermal conduction pathways. The trenches serve both as isolation structures between transistor rows and as thermal management features. This merging reduces the need for separate thermal mitigation structures, thereby lowering integration complexity while maintaining proximity to active devices for effective heat dissipation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The metal structures are designed to perform multiple functions simultaneously: electrical connectivity, thermal conduction, and mechanical support. This multi-functionality allows the same structures to address both electrical interconnection requirements and thermal management needs, reducing overall device complexity while achieving accelerated heat dissipation close to active electronic devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Quantity of substance

If continuous shrinking of transistors is pursued, then device density increases, but thermal mitigation becomes less effective and hot spots form

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice densityVSAvoidhot spot formation
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements localized thermal mitigation features at specific high-heat-generation locations: via structures are placed at individual transistor locations, trenches are positioned between rows of transistors, and pillars are located at strategic hot spot positions. This local quality approach addresses hot spot formation in densely packed transistors by providing targeted thermal pathways where needed most, without requiring uniform thermal structures throughout the entire device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach accelerates heat dissipation and improves thermal management by placing thermal mitigation structures closer to active electronic devices, making existing thermal management measures more efficient and effective in complex computing device designs.

Implementation Method 1

providing improved paths for heat transfer and dissipation closer to the heat sources

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS11410908B2Integrated circuit devices with front-end metal structures
Publication Date: 2022.08.09 INTEL CORP
  • US11410908B2 patent drawing
  • US11410908B2 patent drawing
  • US11410908B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Present disclosure relates to IC devices with thermal mitigation structures in the form of metal structures provided in a semiconductor material of a substrate on which active electronic devices are integrated (i.e., front-end metal structures). In one aspect, an IC device includes a substrate having a first face and a second face, where at least one active electronic device is integrated at the first face of the substrate. The IC device further includes at least one front-end metal structure that extends from the first face of the substrate into the substrate to a depth that is smaller than a distance between the first face and the second face. Providing front-end metal structures may enable improved cooling options because such structures may be placed in closer vicinity to the active electronic devices, compared to conventional thermal mitigation approaches.