Front Fork Cross-Brace Restraint for Wheelie Control and Wear Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional suspension restraint devices for motorcycles fail to effectively prevent the front wheel from rising during aggressive acceleration, leading to steering difficulties and loss of control, while also suffering from wear-and-tear and inadvertent engagement issues.

Innovation Solution

An improved suspension restraint system with a fork ring and latching pins, featuring a cross member and non-linearly mounted fasteners, distributes force and includes wear indicators, allowing for better stability and longevity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a simple hook is used to lock down the front fork, then the center of gravity is lowered and wheelie is prevented, but wear-and-tear on the fork guard increases and inadvertent engagement occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewheelie preventionVSAvoidwear-and-tear on fork guard
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A plastic fork guard interface member is introduced as an intermediary between the metal hook and the fork guard. This interface member absorbs the wear and tear, preventing damage to the fork guard while maintaining the wheelie prevention function. The interface member is specifically designed to be replaceable and resistant to wear from hook engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The interface member is designed as a disposable or replaceable component that can be easily replaced when worn. This allows the expensive fork guard to be protected while the inexpensive interface member absorbs the wear. The system trades a cheap, replaceable part to protect a expensive, permanent structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Reliability

If a simple hook is used to lock down the front fork, then the center of gravity is lowered and wheelie is prevented, but the risk of inadvertent engagement increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewheelie preventionVSAvoidinadvertent engagement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a dynamic release mechanism where the hook automatically disengages from the interface member when the front fork is compressed during braking. This dynamic behavior prevents inadvertent engagement while maintaining reliable wheelie prevention during acceleration. The system transitions between engaged and disengaged states based on operational conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The interface member is designed with features that guide the hook into proper engagement position before final locking occurs. This preliminary positioning action ensures that engagement only happens when properly aligned, preventing inadvertent engagement while maintaining reliable wheelie prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of manufacture

If fasteners are mounted linearly on the fork guard, then installation is simple, but stress concentration occurs reducing device lifespan

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefastener installationVSAvoiddevice lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The fasteners are arranged in a non-linear, asymmetric pattern on the fork guard rather than a simple linear arrangement. This asymmetric distribution of fasteners spreads the stress more evenly across the mounting surface, preventing stress concentration while maintaining ease of installation. The pattern is specifically designed to optimize stress distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The fastener mounting pattern transitions from a one-dimensional linear arrangement to a two-dimensional distributed pattern on the fork guard surface. This dimensional change allows stress to be distributed across a larger area and in multiple directions, preventing stress concentration and extending device lifespan while keeping installation straightforward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS12515759B2Front suspension restraint device having cross brace
Publication Date: 2026.01.06 TAMER BILLET MX INC
  • US12515759B2 patent drawing
  • US12515759B2 patent drawing
  • US12515759B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A suspension restraint device can be used for releasably locking a front fork of a motorcycle. The suspension restraint device can include a hold down component and a cross member. The hold down component can include a hold down base and a plurality of a biased retention members (e.g., spring-loaded latching pin assemblies) received within the hold down base, the hold down base extending in a first direction. The cross member can be mounted to the hold down component between a corresponding pair of biased retention assemblies, the cross member extending in a second direction different than the first direction. The cross member and the hold down component can be configured to be further mounted to a motorcycle plastic component. At least one given biased retention assembly can be configured to releasably lock relative to the front fork of the motorcycle.