Front Fork Upper Fender Steering Rotation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional saddle riding type vehicles with upper fenders cannot turn with the front wheel, leading to inadequate blocking of foreign substances such as pebbles and mud, which compromises rider protection and headlight unit coverage.

Innovation Solution

The design allows the front wheel, lower fender, upper fender, and headlight unit to rotate together with the front fork, ensuring they face the same direction, thereby effectively blocking foreign substances and protecting the headlight unit, with the upper fender extending rearward to cool the headlight unit and reduce air resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the upper fender is fixed to the head tube, then the upper fender structure is simple and stable, but the upper fender cannot turn with the front wheel, causing inadequate blocking of foreign substances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblocking effectivenessVSAvoidmounting construction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The upper fender is mounted on the front fork instead of the head tube, allowing it to rotate dynamically with the front wheel. This dynamic mounting enables the upper fender to maintain proper orientation relative to the front wheel during steering, ensuring continuous effective blocking of foreign substances while traveling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The upper fender is integrated with the front fork assembly, combining the fender's blocking function with the fork's steering function. This merging allows the upper fender to automatically follow the front wheel's rotation, resolving the contradiction between structural simplicity and blocking effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If the upper fender is positioned to block foreign substances effectively, then rider protection is improved, but the headlight unit may be exposed to foreign substances from various directions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverider protection reliabilityVSAvoidheadlight unit exposure to foreign substances
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The upper fender is positioned to surround and cover the headlight unit, creating a nested configuration where the fender acts as a protective shell. This nesting arrangement allows the upper fender to block foreign substances from reaching both the rider and the headlight unit simultaneously, protecting both without compromising either function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Reliability

If the upper fender is made larger to improve foreign substance blocking, then blocking effectiveness is enhanced, but air resistance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforeign substance blockingVSAvoidair resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The upper fender is designed with optimized local geometry, extending rearwardly to provide effective blocking coverage while maintaining a streamlined profile. This local quality optimization ensures that the fender provides maximum blocking effectiveness in critical areas while minimizing overall surface area exposed to airflow, thereby reducing air resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The upper fender extends in the rearward direction rather than increasing lateral or vertical dimensions. This dimensional strategy provides effective blocking coverage by positioning the fender's trailing edge behind the front wheel, preventing foreign substances from reaching the rider and headlight unit while maintaining a compact profile that minimizes air resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances the reliability of blocking foreign substances and protects the rider and headlight unit while reducing air resistance and maintaining effective cooling of the headlight unit.

Implementation Method 1

The upper fender extends further rearward than the headlight unit, and defines a space rearward of the headlight unit. This can cool the rear part of the headlight unit effectively.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Data Source

PatentEP2860088B1Saddle riding type vehicle
Publication Date: 2017.10.04 YAMAHA MOTOR CO LTD
  • EP2860088B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2860088B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2860088B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A saddle riding type vehicle (1) including a head tube (13), a front fork (17) rotatably supported by the head tube (13), a handlebar (19) supported by an upper part of the front fork (17), a front wheel (21) supported by a lower part of the front fork (17), a lower fender (23) supported by the front fork (17) for covering an area above the front wheel (21), an upper fender (25) supported by the front fork (17) and disposed above the lower fender (23) and a headlight unit (27) supported by the front fork (17) wherein the front wheel (21), the lower fender (23), the upper fender (25) and the headlight unit (27) are integrally turnable with operation of the handlebar (19).