Vehicle Front Pillar Reinforcement for Crush Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle body structures with closed cross-section front and hinge pillar portions face challenges in suppressing bending deformation and crushing when subjected to external forces, particularly due to weight considerations and the need for improved visibility and design, where current reinforcement methods increase weight without adequately addressing these issues.

Innovation Solution

A reinforcement portion, specifically a plate-like member with bead and flange portions, is strategically placed to cover the area of maximum curvature between the front and hinge pillar portions, enhancing proof stress and suppressing crushing and bending deformation while maintaining a lightweight configuration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a hollow closed section member with triangular cross section is provided in the front pillar portion to reinforce pillar rigidity, then the pillar rigidity is improved, but the weight of the hollow closed section member increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepillar rigidityVSAvoidweight of hollow closed section member
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies local reinforcement by providing a reinforcement portion specifically at the bent portion of the front pillar portion where the cross-sectional shape changes. This localized approach reinforces the critical area without requiring a complete hollow closed section member throughout the entire front pillar, thereby reducing overall weight while maintaining necessary rigidity at the stress-concentration zone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The front pillar portion is segmented into different functional zones: the bent portion receives additional reinforcement while other portions maintain their basic structure. This segmentation allows the reinforcement to be applied only where needed (at the maximum curvature position) rather than uniformly throughout the entire pillar, resolving the contradiction between overall rigidity and weight reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Illumination intensity

If the front pillar portion is formed to be thin to improve visibility and vehicle design, then visibility and design are improved, but breakage easily occurs at the section where the cross-sectional shape changes

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovevisibilityVSAvoidresistance to breakage at cross-section change
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The front pillar portion is designed with non-uniform thickness and additional reinforcement specifically at the bent portion where the cross-sectional shape changes. This allows the pillar to be thin in most areas for improved visibility while having localized thickness enhancement and reinforcement at the critical stress concentration zone to prevent breakage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement portion is provided in advance at the bent portion to preemptively strengthen the area prone to breakage. By anticipating the stress concentration at the cross-sectional change location and providing reinforcement before load application, the design prevents breakage while maintaining thin overall dimensions for visibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Illumination intensity

If the front pillar portion is made thin for improved visibility and design demands, then visibility is improved, but bending deformation occurs more easily when load is input

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovevisibilityVSAvoidresistance to bending deformation
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The front pillar portion employs local quality enhancement by providing a reinforcement portion specifically at the bent portion while keeping other portions thin. This localized reinforcement at the maximum curvature position provides resistance to bending deformation where it is most needed, allowing the overall pillar to remain thin for visibility while maintaining stability at the critical zone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP3747740B1Upper vehicle-body structure and vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.01.15 MAZDA MOTOR CORP
  • EP3747740B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3747740B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3747740B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The upper vehicle-body structure includes: front pillar portions each having a closed cross-section structure, the front pillar portions being located on both of left and right sides of a front windshield in a vehicle width direction; and hinge pillar portions each having a closed cross-section structure, the hinge pillar portions extending downward from front end portions of the front pillar portions to support door hinge members, an area of a cross section orthogonal to a longitudinal direction X of each of the front pillar portions is smaller than an area of a cross section orthogonal to a longitudinal direction Y of the hinge pillar portion, and a reinforcement portion that suppresses crushing of a closed cross-section portion formed by the front pillar portion and the hinge pillar portion is provided so as to cover a position at which a curvature of an edge on a door opening portion side in a cross section orthogonal to a longitudinal direction of a bent portion between the front pillar portion and the hinge pillar portion is maximum.