Variable Thickness Front Pillar Outer for Collision Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing front pillar designs for vehicles fail to adequately enhance both the strength for collision resistance and rigidity for traveling stability.

Innovation Solution

A front pillar outer structure comprising two members with overlapping flange parts and main body parts, where the second member has a greater plate thickness than the first member, providing increased collision resistance through buckling strength and improved rigidity by stacking material layers in compressive regions and maintaining sufficient strength in tensile regions with reduced weight.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a single uniform plate thickness is used for the front pillar outer, then the manufacturing process is simple, but the collision resistance and rigidity are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision resistanceVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The front pillar outer is designed with different plate thicknesses in different regions: a first plate thickness in the compressive strain region and a second plate thickness in the tensile strain region. This local differentiation optimizes collision resistance where needed while maintaining overall structural efficiency, resolving the contradiction between strength improvement and structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from a single-dimensional uniform thickness design to a multi-dimensional variable thickness design, where plate thickness varies along the longitudinal direction of the front pillar outer. This dimensional change enables optimized collision resistance in specific regions without requiring complete structural redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Strength

If the plate thickness is increased throughout the front pillar outer, then the strength and rigidity are improved, but the weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproverigidityVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of uniformly increasing plate thickness throughout the entire front pillar outer, the invention applies increased thickness (first plate thickness) only in the compressive strain region where collision forces are concentrated. The tensile strain region maintains a thinner second plate thickness, thereby improving rigidity and collision resistance while minimizing weight increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If reinforcement plates are added to the front pillar, then the strength is increased, but the device complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention integrates the reinforcement function directly into the front pillar outer body by forming different plate thickness regions within the same component. This merging of reinforcement and structural functions eliminates the need for separate reinforcement plates, reducing component count and manufacturing complexity while maintaining enhanced strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The front pillar outer effectively functions as a composite structure with different plate thicknesses (first and second plate thicknesses) in different regions. This composite design approach provides varied mechanical properties within a single component, achieving reinforcement without adding separate material layers or components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Strength

If the front pillar outer is designed with high strength materials, then the collision resistance is improved, but the manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision resistanceVSAvoidplate thickness control
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The front pillar outer is segmented into distinct regions with different plate thicknesses: a compressive strain region with a first plate thickness and a tensile strain region with a second plate thickness. This segmentation allows for controlled variation in thickness while maintaining manufacturability, as each region can be formed with standard tolerances appropriate to its function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP4001061B1Front pillar outer
Publication Date: 2023.09.20 NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION
  • EP4001061B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4001061B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4001061B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

An objective of the present invention is to provide a front pillar outer that has high strength and high rigidity. In an area (O1) in which the first door-side flange part (13) and a second door-side flange part (23) overlap with each other, the first door-side flange part (13) and the second door-side flange part (23) are joined to each other. In an area (O2) in which the first glass-face-side flange part (12) and the second glass-face-side flange part (22) overlap with each other, the first glass-face-side flange part (12) and the second glass-face-side flange part (22) are joined to each other.