Front Wheel Drive Control for Work Vehicles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional front wheel drive systems in work vehicles, such as motor graders, face challenges in independently controlling the average and differential speeds of the front wheels, leading to trade-offs between acceleration, load acceptance, steering, and lateral traction, with average and differential speeds being side effects of existing control loops rather than direct controls.

Innovation Solution

A wheel drive control system that directly and independently controls the average and differential response characteristics of the front wheels, using a transmission controller connected to sensors and hydrostatic transmissions to adjust swash plates and motor positions, allowing for precise control of front and rear wheel speeds and torque, improving overall efficiency and operating experience.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional independent control loops are used for each front wheel, then wheel speed control is achieved, but average speed and differential speed cannot be directly controlled, leading to trade-offs between acceleration/load acceptance and steering/lateral traction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol of average and differential speedsVSAvoidcontrol loop structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system segments the control functions by separating average speed control and differential speed control into independent control loops. Each loop can be optimized for its specific function, allowing direct control over both average and differential speeds without the trade-offs inherent in conventional unified control approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control system introduces intermediate control variables (average speed and differential speed) that mediate between the individual wheel speed commands and the actual wheel speeds. This allows the system to directly control the collective behavior of the front wheels while maintaining the ability to handle individual wheel requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Speed

If open differentials and limited differentials are used, then power distribution to rear wheels is achieved, but front wheel speed differentiation during turns is not adequately addressed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefront wheel speed differentiationVSAvoidpower distribution capability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control system applies local quality by allowing each front wheel to have independent speed control capabilities while maintaining overall system coordination. The system can differentiate speeds between left and right front wheels during turns while still providing coordinated power distribution to all wheels, achieving both local differentiation and global coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically adjusts the speed of each front wheel based on real-time operating conditions, including turn angle, vehicle speed, and terrain requirements. This dynamic control allows the system to adapt power distribution and wheel speeds continuously, providing both speed differentiation and versatile power distribution capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If conventional control systems are used, then basic wheel drive functionality is maintained, but steering performance and lateral traction are compromised due to indirect differential speed control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteering performanceVSAvoidoperating efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system implements feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor actual wheel speeds, vehicle orientation, and terrain conditions. This feedback allows the system to adjust control commands in real-time, improving steering performance and lateral traction while maintaining high operating efficiency through optimized power distribution and speed control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides direct control over front wheel speeds and torque, enhancing vehicle efficiency, steering performance, and reducing slipping, thereby improving the overall operating experience and traction capabilities of work vehicles.

Implementation Method 1

The controller (110) may be in operable communication with a left hydrostatic transmission (120) and a right hydrostatic transmission (130)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrostatic transmission: Hydraulic Press

Data Source

PatentUS9056624B2Front wheel drive control
Publication Date: 2015.06.16 DEERE & CO
  • US9056624B2 patent drawing
  • US9056624B2 patent drawing
  • US9056624B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A front wheel power system which may enable independent control of power to each wheel as well as yield direct control over average and differential front wheel speeds.