FRP Drilling Damage Measurement Using Scanned Hole Image Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for characterizing drilling damage in fiber reinforced plastic composites are expensive, time-consuming, and lack automation, particularly in quantifying burr and delamination damages, which are critical for improving the service life of workpieces under fatigue loads.

Innovation Solution

A system and method involving a scanner and computing device to measure and calculate delamination size and factor by analyzing scanned images of drilled holes, using a black substrate to isolate damage peaks and employing AutoCAD image processing techniques for accurate measurement of chip and burr regions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If expensive equipment like electron microscopes or acoustic microscopes is used to characterize drilling damage, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling damage characterizationVSAvoidequipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses optical copying techniques to create images of drilling damage on the workpiece surface. Instead of using complex electron microscopes or acoustic microscopes, the invention employs simple optical cameras and image processing to capture and analyze damage patterns, achieving adequate measurement precision with much simpler equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical and physical measurement systems (electron microscopes, acoustic microscopes) with optical imaging and computational analysis. By substituting physical measurement mechanisms with optical-field-based imaging and software-based damage quantification, the system achieves comparable measurement precision with significantly reduced device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If manual procedures are used to characterize drilling damage, then measurement precision can be maintained, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage measurement accuracyVSAvoidcharacterization speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automated image processing algorithms that automatically detect, measure, and quantify drilling damage without requiring manual intervention. The system self-services by capturing images, processing them through computational algorithms, and generating damage characterization results automatically, thereby maintaining measurement precision while dramatically increasing productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables continuous automated characterization of drilling damage by implementing a workflow where images are continuously captured and processed. Multiple workpieces can be characterized in sequence without interruption, maintaining consistent measurement precision while achieving high throughput and productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Measurement precision

If quantization of burr and delamination damages is implemented, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage quantizationVSAvoidmeasurement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex physical measurement devices with optical imaging and computational quantification methods. By using image processing algorithms to automatically measure and quantify burr and delamination damages, the system achieves precise damage quantization without requiring complex measurement hardware

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses optical copying to create digital representations of drilling damage, which can then be precisely measured and quantified using software algorithms. This approach enables accurate quantization of damage dimensions while keeping the physical measurement system simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Productivity

If automated image processing is used to characterize drilling damage, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision may decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharacterization automationVSAvoiddamage measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service automated image processing with algorithms that automatically detect edges, measure dimensions, and quantify damage. The system includes self-correction mechanisms that validate measurements and ensure precision is maintained while achieving high productivity through full automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11373296B1System and method for analysis of chip and burr formation in drilled fiber reinforced plastic composites using image processing
Publication Date: 2022.06.28 KING ABDULAZIZ UNIV
  • US11373296B1 patent drawing
  • US11373296B1 patent drawing
  • US11373296B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and a method for measuring drilling damage in fiber reinforced plastic (FRP) composites is described. Multiple holes are drilled in the FRP composite using a drill having nominal diameter, and the FRP composite is separated into multiple drilled blocks. Each block, covered with the black substrate, is scanned on a scanner to generate a scanned image depicting a hole region, a background, and delamination damage peaks. For each scanned image, a maximum delamination damage peak and a maximum diameter of a first circle concentric with the drilled hole and passing through tip of the maximum delamination peak, are measured. Further, a delamination size and a delamination factor are calculated based on the maximum diameter of the first circle and the nominal diameter of the drill.