FRP Mesh Rod Joint Structure for Higher Axial Tensile Strength

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing FRP rod connections in masonry and concrete structures suffer from insufficient strength and reliability, particularly under alternating loads, due to small contact areas and brittle failure modes.

Innovation Solution

The FRP mesh is formed by connecting longitudinal and transverse rods at a right angle, with roving strands of unequal thickness oriented perpendicularly around the transverse rod, forming cavities and ensuring a secure contact zone on both sides of the longitudinal axis, enhancing axial tensile strength and preventing warping.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If rods are connected by passing one rod through the structure of the other rod, then the connection is formed, but the fibres of the outer rod are split into equal bundles, making the product brittle due to small contact area

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection formationVSAvoidaxial tensile strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by splitting the longitudinal rod's roving into unequal bundles (first bundle with more strands than the second bundle) rather than equal bundles. This asymmetric distribution creates unequal contact zones on opposite sides of the transverse rod, with the first contact zone having larger area than the second contact zone, thereby preventing brittle failure and improving axial tensile strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by creating non-uniform contact zones between rods. The first contact zone is designed to have a larger contact area with the transverse rod compared to the second contact zone. This localized variation in contact quality ensures that the majority of load is carried by the larger contact zone, preventing catastrophic failure while maintaining manufacturability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If only a half of the rod works in case of breaking axial load, then the connection is simple, but splitting of the product at the joints becomes possible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection structureVSAvoidjoint reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The asymmetric bundle distribution ensures that both sides of the transverse rod contribute to load-bearing, with the first side (having larger contact zone) carrying more load. This prevents the scenario where only half the rod works, thereby eliminating the risk of splitting at joints while keeping the connection structure relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements beforehand cushioning by creating a polymer layer in the cavities between the longitudinal and transverse rods. This polymer layer acts as a cushioning element that prevents stress concentration and splitting at the joints, thereby improving joint reliability before failure can occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Ease of manufacture

If contact zone is located on one side of the rod, then the manufacturing is simpler, but the product becomes brittle and splitting is possible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact zone formationVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent positions contact zones on both sides of the transverse rod rather than on one side, creating an asymmetric configuration where the first contact zone has larger area than the second. This bilateral contact zone arrangement maintains structural integrity and prevents brittleness while remaining manufacturable through the roving splitting process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves high axial tensile strength and reliable connections, ensuring both rods contribute to load-bearing, with improved resistance to axial tension and preventing structural failure at joints.

Implementation Method 1

the cavities between the rectilinear sections of the outer rod and the surface of the inner rod are partially or completely filled with the polymer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentUS20260049473A1Composite mesh
Publication Date: 2026.02.19 LLC COMPOSITE GRP CHELYABINSK
  • US20260049473A1 patent drawing
  • US20260049473A1 patent drawing
  • US20260049473A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The utility model relates to the production of fiber-reinforced polymer mesh made of non-metallic materials, used for reinforcing masonry and brickwork, concrete structures, for soil reinforcement, as well as for fencing and increasing the service life of roads.The task of the utility model is to create a FRP mesh having high consumer characteristics, physical and mechanical properties, while ensuring high axial tensile strength of both longitudinal and transverse rods.The FRP mesh is made of longitudinal and transverse rods connected to each other in accordance with the principles of the utility model; the mesh cell zone is formed by connecting cured and uncured rods at a right angle with subsequent curing of the mesh, in that case the connection of rods is carried out by feeding bundles of roving strands belonging to the formed longitudinal rod that are divided into strands of unequal thickness, are oriented perpendicularly to the longitudinal axis of the transverse rod and cover areas of its radial surface on opposite sides, which leads to the formation of cavities between rectilinear sections of the longitudinal rod and the surface of the transverse rod (FIG. 6, Table 2)