Fiber-Reinforced Plastic Mud Flap Bracket Corrosion Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mud flap assemblies for vehicles are prone to corrosion and damage from environmental factors and road debris, leading to increased complexity, cost, and weight, which are not adequately addressed by current systems.

Innovation Solution

A mud flap assembly design featuring a bracket with a core and bands made of different materials, including fiber-reinforced plastics, and support arms with ribs, which are cantilevered and integrally formed with the mud flaps to resist corrosion and deflection, ensuring the mud flaps remain attached during forces applied.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional metal components are used in mud flap assemblies, then strength and durability are improved, but corrosion resistance deteriorates due to exposure to sand, gravel, chemicals, and moisture

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidcorrosion resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by using fiber-reinforced plastic (FRP) for the support arms and bracket components. The FRP material combines glass or carbon fibers with a polymer matrix to achieve both high strength and excellent corrosion resistance, eliminating the corrosion problem associated with traditional metal components while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the material parameters by transitioning from metallic materials to polymer-composite materials. This parameter change involves selecting materials with specific tensile strength, elongation, and corrosion resistance properties that optimize performance in the harsh environmental conditions while reducing weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of repair

If multiple separate components are used in mud flap assemblies, then ease of repair is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent replaceabilityVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the mud flap assembly into distinct modular components: the bracket assembly (with integrated support arms) and the mud flap panel. This segmentation allows the mud flap to be easily replaced independently while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure that reduces assembly complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Strength

If heavier materials are used to resist forces applied to mud flaps, then strength is improved, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce resistanceVSAvoidassembly weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses fiber-reinforced plastic materials that provide high strength-to-weight ratio. The glass or carbon fibers embedded in the polymer matrix deliver exceptional tensile strength and force resistance while being significantly lighter than traditional metal components, thus reducing overall assembly weight without compromising strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by varying the thickness and fiber orientation of the FRP components in different regions. The support arms and bracket have increased thickness and optimized fiber alignment in high-stress areas to resist applied forces, while maintaining thinner sections in low-stress areas to minimize weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design effectively reduces corrosion and damage, maintains the mud flaps' attachment, and minimizes weight and cost by using materials that provide bending stiffness and resistance to punctures, while maintaining functionality against environmental and operational forces.

Implementation Method 1

The design effectively reduces corrosion and damage, maintains the mud flaps' attachment, and minimizes weight and cost by using materials that provide bending stiffness and resistance to punctures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCorrosion resistance:

Implementation Method 2

the first support arm is arranged to deflect in response to a first force that is applied to the first mud flap and the second support arm is arranged to deflect in response to a second force that is applied to the second mud flap

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deflection: Elasticity

Implementation Method 3

using materials that provide bending stiffness and resistance to punctures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBending stiffness:

Implementation Method 4

the mud flap resists decoupling from the first support arm when the first support arm deflects

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical attachment: Mechanical Fastener

Data Source

PatentUS9550533B2Mud flap assembly
Publication Date: 2017.01.24 WABASH NATIONAL CORP
  • US9550533B2 patent drawing
  • US9550533B2 patent drawing
  • US9550533B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A mud flap assembly is arranged behind a wheel of a vehicle to block mud, water, and/or debris from being thrown into the air. The mud flap assembly includes a bracket and a mud flap. The bracket couples the mud flap assembly with the vehicle. The mud flap extends downwardly away from the bracket.