FRU Storage Device File System Areas for Extended Format Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing FRU storage devices face issues with data encoding errors and lack of flexibility due to pre-defined formats, which become inadequate as electronic components evolve and require increased types and quantities of information storage, leading to compatibility issues and errors during data retrieval.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an FRU storage device that supports extended formats such as binary data, JSON, and Redfish Device Enablement-defined binary encoded JSON, with a common header indicating the presence of extended format data and providing location information for a file system area, allowing access by a file system, thereby enhancing flexibility and compatibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If pre-defined formats are used for storing electronic component data, then data storage is simple and compatible with existing systems, but flexibility and adaptability decrease as electronic components evolve and require increased types and quantities of information storage

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidformat complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The storage device is segmented into multiple distinct areas: a first area storing data in traditional pre-defined formats and a second area storing data in extended formats. This segmentation allows the system to maintain both legacy compatibility and support for new, more flexible data formats simultaneously, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new dimension to the storage architecture by adding a second storage area with extended formats alongside the traditional first area. This dimensional expansion allows the system to handle increased types and quantities of information without disrupting existing pre-defined format structures, thereby improving flexibility while managing complexity through organized expansion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If extended formats are implemented to support increased data types and quantities, then flexibility and adaptability improve, but compatibility issues and data retrieval errors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoiddata integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the storage into separate first and second areas with distinct format types, the system isolates extended format data from traditional format data. This prevents compatibility issues and retrieval errors by ensuring that data access operations targeting pre-defined formats continue to function reliably while new extended formats are available in the second area for applications that require them.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a file system area that acts as an intermediary layer between the storage medium and data access operations. This intermediary manages the different format types, translating and coordinating access to both pre-defined and extended formats, thereby maintaining data integrity and reliability while supporting flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Quantity of substance

If pre-defined formats are used, then data retrieval is reliable and compatible, but data complexity and information capacity are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation capacityVSAvoidformat structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The storage device is divided into a first area for traditional pre-defined formats and a second area for extended formats with greater information capacity. This segmentation allows the system to accommodate increased data complexity and information quantity in the second area while preserving the simpler, more reliable first area for existing formats, thus managing format structure complexity through organized separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The storage device is designed with multi-functionality to handle both traditional and extended formats across its two areas. This universal design enables the system to support increased information capacity through extended formats while maintaining compatibility with existing pre-defined formats, effectively managing the contradiction between capacity and structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12032517B2File system areas in field replaceable unit storage devices
Publication Date: 2024.07.09 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEV LP
  • US12032517B2 patent drawing
  • US12032517B2 patent drawing
  • US12032517B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In some examples, a field replaceable unit (FRU) storage device includes a storage medium storing a plurality of information areas and a common header for the plurality of information areas. The common header contains an indicator that when set to a first value indicates presence in the FRU storage device of first electronic component data according to an extended format that is different from a first format governing storage of second electronic component data in the FRU storage device relating to an electronic component in an FRU. The common header contains a field set to location information referring to a storage location of a file system area on the FRU storage device when the indicator is set to the first value, the file system area containing the first electronic component data according to the extended format and that relates to an electronic component in the FRU, wherein the file system area is accessible by a file system using information in the file system area.