Frunk Hood Venting With Air Bladder for Low-Force Closure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In electric vehicles, closing the hood of the front storage compartment (frunk) requires excessive effort due to trapped pressurized air, and existing venting systems risk contamination from ambient air through grille openings.

Innovation Solution

A closure assist system with an air inlet portal, conduit, and inflatable bladder that directs and captures pressurized air within a closed loop, allowing it to exit back into the compartment upon opening, while preventing external contaminants from entering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the hood is sealed with an elastomer seal to prevent water and dirt from entering the storage space, then the sealing performance is improved, but the closing effort increases due to trapped pressurized air

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing performanceVSAvoidclosing effort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the pressurized air from the storage space by providing a venting portal that allows air to escape during hood closure. This extraction of the harmful factor (pressurized air) resolves the contradiction by maintaining the seal for preventing water and dirt entry while reducing the closing effort through air venting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary component (venting portal or grille) that mediates between the sealed storage space and the external environment. This intermediary allows pressurized air to escape while the seal prevents water and dirt from entering, thus resolving the contradiction between sealing performance and closing effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Force

If grille openings are provided to vent pressurized air from the storage space, then the closing effort is reduced, but water and dirt may enter through the openings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosing effortVSAvoidwater and dirt entry
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making the venting portal selective in its function. The portal is designed with specific characteristics (such as being positioned above the seal line or having specific geometry) that allow it to vent air while preventing water and dirt from entering, thus resolving the contradiction between reducing closing effort and preventing contaminant entry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful effect of pressurized air (which increases closing effort) into a beneficial flow pattern where the escaping air creates a protective effect that prevents water and dirt from entering through the venting portal. The air flow itself becomes a barrier against contaminants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If a sealed system is used to prevent water and dirt entry, then the protection against contaminants is improved, but pressurized air cannot escape during hood closure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontaminant preventionVSAvoidclosing effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the protection system into two distinct functions: a seal that prevents water and dirt entry, and a venting portal that allows pressurized air to escape. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by allowing each component to perform its specific function without interfering with the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamics by making the venting portal active during the closing process. The portal allows air to escape when needed (during closure when pressurization occurs) while maintaining protection against contaminants during normal operation, thus resolving the contradiction between sealed protection and pressure relief.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Facilitates easy hood closure with reduced effort and maintains compartment cleanliness by sealing the system from external elements.

Implementation Method 1

A bladder, that may be an inflatable bladder, is coupled with the conduit to receive the pressurized air from the storage space upon closing of the hood. The bladder expands upon receiving the pressurized air.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInflation: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

A seal surrounds the opening of the containment member. The seal contacts the hood when it is in its closed position to provide an airtight seal pressuring air within the containment member.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSealing: Physical Containment

Data Source

PatentUS12605988B2Hood closure assist system
Publication Date: 2026.04.21 FCA US LLC
  • US12605988B2 patent drawing
  • US12605988B2 patent drawing
  • US12605988B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle storage space closing assist system has an air inlet portal in the storage space to enable air to exit from the storage space upon closing a hood covering the storage space. A conduit directs air away from the storage space upon closing of the hood. A bladder couples with the conduit to receive pressurized air upon closing of the hood. An outlet portal is coupled with the conduit to enable exiting of the pressurized air back into the storage space upon opening of the hood.